Source: European Medicines Agency (EU) Revision Year: 2025 Publisher: Roche Registration GmbH, Emil-Barell-Strasse 1, 79639 Grenzach-Wyhlen, Germany
Pharmacotherapeutic group: Antineoplastic agents, other monoclonal antibodies and antibody drug conjugates
ATC code: L01FX28
Glofitamab is a bispecific monoclonal antibody that binds bivalently to CD20 expressed on the surface of B cells and monovalently to CD3 in the T-cell receptor complex expressed on the surface of T cells. By simultaneous binding to CD20 on the B cell and CD3 on the T cell, glofitamab mediates the formation of an immunological synapse with subsequent T-cell activation and proliferation, secretion of cytokines and release of cytolytic proteins that results in the lysis of CD20-expressing B cells.
In study NP30179, 84% (84/100) of patients were already B-cell depleted (<70 cells/μL) before pre-treatment with obinutuzumab. The proportion of patients with B-cell depletion increased to 100% (94/94) after obinutuzumab pre-treatment prior to Columvi treatment initiation, and B-cell counts remained low during Columvi treatment.
During Cycle 1 (step-up dosing), transient increases in plasma IL-6 levels were observed at 6 hours post Columvi infusion, which remained elevated at 20 hours post-infusion and returned to baseline prior to the next infusion.
In study GO41944 (STARGLO), 63.9% (115/180) of patients were already B-cell depleted (<70 cells/μL) before pre-treatment with obinutuzumab. The proportion of patients with B-cell depletion increased to 79.4% (143/180) after obinutuzumab pre-treatment prior to Columvi treatment initiation, and B-cell counts remained low during Columvi treatment.
In study NP30179, 16/145 patients who were exposed to Columvi experienced a post-baseline QTc value >450 ms. One of these cases was assessed to be of clinical significance by the investigator. No patients discontinued treatment due to QTc prolongation.
In study GO41944 (STARGLO), 16/172 patients who were exposed to Columvi experienced a post-baseline QTc value >450 ms. No patients discontinued treatment due to QTc prolongation.
An open-label multicentre, multi-cohort trial (NP30179) was conducted to evaluate Columvi in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. In the single-arm monotherapy DLBCL cohort (n=108), patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL were required to have received at least two prior lines of systemic therapy, including an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody and an anthracycline agent. Patients with FL3b and Richter transformation were not eligible. Patients were expected to present CD20-positive DLBCL, but biomarker eligibility was not a requirement for inclusion (see section 4.4).
The study excluded patients with ECOG performance status ≥2, significant cardiovascular disease (such as New York Heart Association Class III or IV cardiac disease, myocardial infarction within the last 6 months, unstable arrhythmias, or unstable angina), significant active pulmonary disease, impaired renal functions (CrCL <50 mL/min with elevated serum creatinine level), active autoimmune disease requiring immunosuppressive therapy, active infections (i.e., chronic active EBV, acute or chronic hepatitis C, hepatitis B, HIV), progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, current or a history of CNS lymphoma or CNS disease, a history of macrophage activation syndrome/hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, prior allogeneic stem cell transplant, prior organ transplantation, or hepatic transaminases ≥3 × ULN.
All patients received pre-treatment with obinutuzumab at Cycle 1 Day 1. Patients received 2.5 mg of Columvi at Cycle 1 Day 8, 10 mg of Columvi at Cycle 1 Day 15, and 30 mg of Columvi at Cycle 2 Day 1 as per the step-up dosing schedule. Patients continued to receive 30 mg of Columvi on Day 1 of Cycles 3 to 12. The duration of each cycle was 21 days. Patients received a median of 5 cycles of Columvi treatment (range: 1 to 13 cycles); 34.7% received 8 or more cycles and 25.7% received 12 cycles of Columvi treatment.
The baseline demographic and disease characteristics were: median age 66 years (range: 21 to 90 years) with 53.7% aged 65 years or older and 15.7% aged 75 years or older; 69.4% males; 74.1% white, 5.6% Asian and 0.9% Black or African American; 5.6% Hispanic or Latino; and ECOG performance status of 0 (46.3%) or 1 (52.8%). Most patients (71.3%) had DLBCL not otherwise specified, 7.4% had DLBCL transformed from follicular lymphoma, 8.3% had high-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBCL) or another histology transformed from follicular lymphoma, 7.4% had HGBCL, and 5.6% had primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL). The median number of prior lines of therapy was 3 (range: 2 to 7); 39.8% of patients received 2 prior lines and 60.2% received 3 or more prior lines of therapy. All patients had received prior chemotherapy (all patients received alkylator therapy and 98.1% of patients received anthracycline therapy) and all patients had received prior anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy; 35.2% of patients had received prior CAR T-cell therapy, and 16.7% of patients had received autologous stem cell transplant. Most patients (89.8%) had refractory disease, 60.2% of patients had primary refractory disease and 83.3% of patients were refractory to their last prior therapy.
The primary efficacy outcome measure was complete response (CR) rate as assessed by an independent review committee (IRC) using 2014 Lugano criteria. The overall median duration of follow-up was 15 months (range: 0 to 21 months). The secondary efficacy outcome measures included overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), duration of complete response (DOCR), and time to first complete response (TFCR) as assessed by IRC.
Efficacy results are summarised in Table 8.
Table 8. Summary of efficacy in patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL:
Efficacy endpoints | Columvi N=108 |
---|---|
Complete response | |
Patients with CR, n (%) | 38 (35.2) |
95% CI | [26.24, 44.96] |
Overall response rate | |
Patients with CR or PR, n (%) | 54 (50.0) |
95% CI | [40.22, 59.78] |
Duration of complete response1 | |
Median DOCR, months [95% CI] | NE [18.4, NE] |
Range, months | 02−202 |
12-month DOCR, % [95% CI]3 | 74.6 [59.19, 89.93] |
Duration of response4 | |
Median duration, months [95% CI] | 14.4 [8.6, NE] |
Range, months | 02−202 |
Time to first complete response | |
Median TFCR, days [95% CI] | 42 [41, 47] |
Range, days | 31–308 |
CI=confidence interval; NE=not estimable; PR=partial response.
Hypothesis testing was conducted on the primary endpoint of IRC-assessed CR rate.
1 DOCR is defined as the date of first complete response until disease progression or death due to any cause.
2 Censored observations.
3 Event-free rates based on Kaplan-Meier estimates.
4 DOR is defined as the date of first response (PR or CR) until disease progression or death due to any cause.
The median follow-up for DOR was 12.8 months (range: 0 to 20 months).
The efficacy of Columvi in combination with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (Columvi+GemOx) was evaluated in study GO41944 (STARGLO), an open-label multicentre, randomised clinical trial in 274 patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL not otherwise specified (DLBCL NOS).
The study included patients with DLBCL NOS who received only one prior line of therapy who were not candidates for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), or who had received ≥2 prior therapies. Patients were required to have ECOG performance status ≤2, CrCL ≥30 mL/min, hepatic transaminases ≤2.5 × ULN, no significant cardiovascular disease (such as New York Heart Association Class III or IV cardiac disease, myocardial infarction within the last 3 months, unstable arrhythmias, or unstable angina) and no current or prior CNS lymphoma or CNS disease, no active autoimmune disease requiring immunosuppressive therapy, no active infections (i.e., chronic active EBV, active hepatitis B, hepatitis C), and no history of any of the following: HIV, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, prior allogeneic stem cell transplant, or prior organ transplantation. Patients with HGBCL, PMBCL, or history of transformation of indolent disease to DLBCL were excluded.
Patients who received only one prior line of therapy were not considered candidates for transplant if they met at least one of the following criteria: age ≥70 years, ECOG performance status 2, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%, insufficient response to salvage therapy prior to ASCT, CrCL ≤45 mL/min, other comorbidities or criteria that preclude use of transplant based on local practice standards or in the investigator’s opinion, or patient refusal of high-dose chemotherapy and/or transplant.
Patients were randomised 2:1 to receive Columvi+GemOx (N=183) or rituximab in combination with gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin (R-GemOx; N=91) for 8 cycles, followed by 4 additional cycles of Columvi monotherapy for patients in the Columvi+GemOx arm. Randomisation was stratified by number of previous lines of systemic therapy for DLBCL (1 vs. ≥2) and outcome of last systemic therapy (relapsed vs. refractory).
In the Columvi+GemOx arm, patients received pre-treatment with obinutuzumab at Cycle 1 Day 1 followed by 2.5 mg of Columvi at Cycle 1 Day 8, 10 mg of Columvi at Cycle 1 Day 15, and 30 mg of Columvi at Cycle 2 Day 1 as per the step-up dosing schedule. Patients continued to receive 30 mg of Columvi on Day 1 of Cycles 3 to 12. Gemcitabine (1000 mg/m²) and oxaliplatin (100 mg/m²) were administered intravenously on Day 2 of Cycle 1 and then on Day 1 of subsequent cycles, up to Cycle 8. The duration of each cycle was 21 days in both arms. Patients received a median of 11 cycles of Columvi treatment (range: 1 to 13 cycles); 64.5% received 8 or more cycles and 44.8% received 12 cycles of Columvi treatment.
The baseline demographic and disease characteristics were: median age 68 years (range: 20 to 88 years) with 62.8% aged 65 years or older and 23.7% aged 75 years or older; 57.7% males; 42% white, 50% Asian, and 1.1% Black or African American; 5.8% Hispanic or Latino; and ECOG performance status of 0 (43.3%), 1 (46.6%), or 2 (10.1%). The majority of patients (62.8%) had received 1 prior line of systemic therapy; 37.2% of patients received 2 or more prior lines. All patients had received prior chemotherapy and most (98.5%) had received prior anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy; 7.7% of patients had received prior CAR T-cell therapy, and 4.0% of patients had received autologous stem cell transplant. The majority of patients (66.8%) had refractory disease, 55.8% of patients had primary refractory disease, and 60.6% of patients were refractory to their last prior therapy. The most common reasons why patients were not considered candidates for transplant included age (42.3%), patient refused high-dose chemotherapy and/or transplant (34.7%), and insufficient response to salvage therapy (9.9%).
The primary efficacy outcome measure was overall survival (OS). At the time of the prespecified primary analysis, a statistically significant improvement in OS was observed for patients randomised to the Columvi+GemOx arm compared to patients randomised to R-GemOx (HR 0.59, 95% CI: 0.40, 0.89; p-value=0.011). Median OS in the R-GemOx arm was 9.0 months (95% CI: 7.3, 14.4) and was not reached in the Columvi+GemOx arm (95% CI: 13.8, NE). Statistically significant improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) and CR rate, as assessed by an IRC, were also observed with Columvi+GemOx over R-GemOx. Median PFS was 12.1 months (95% CI: 6.8, 18.3) in the Columvi+GemOx arm versus 3.3 months (95% CI: 2.5, 5.6) in the R-GemOx arm (HR 0.37, 95% CI: 0.25, 0.55; p-value<0.001). The rate of complete response was 50.3% with Columvi+GemOx versus 22.0% with R-GemOx, a difference of 28.3% (p-value<0.001).
Overall survival, PFS, and CR results from an updated analysis conducted after an additional 10.5 months of follow-up continue to demonstrate benefit of Columvi+GemOx over R-GemOx. The key results are summarised in Table 9. Kaplan-Meier plots for OS and PFS from the updated analysis are presented in Figure 1 and Figure 2, respectively. Exploratory subgroup analysis at the time of the updated analysis showed an OS hazard ratio of 1.09 (95% CI: 0.54, 2.18) and PFS hazard ratio of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.44, 1.59) for patients enrolled in Europe.
Table 9. Efficacy in patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL treated with Columvi in combination with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (ITT):
Efficacy endpoints | Updated analysis (median observation time=20.7 months) | |
---|---|---|
Columvi+GemOx N=183 | R-GemOx N=91 | |
Overall survival | ||
Number (%) of deaths | 80 (43.7) | 52 (57.1) |
Median (95% CI), months | 25.5 (18.3, NE) | 12.9 (7.9, 18.5) |
HR (95% CI) | 0.62 (0.43, 0.88) | |
Progression-free survival – IRC-assessed | ||
Number (%) of patients with events | 90 (49.2) | 54 (59.3) |
Median (95% CI), months | 13.8 (8.7, 20.5) | 3.6 (2.5, 7.1) |
HR (95% CI) | 0.40 (0.28, 0.57) | |
Complete response rate – IRC-assessed | ||
Responders (%) | 107 (58.5) | 23 (25.3) |
Difference in response rate (95% CI), % | 33.2 (20.9, 45.5) | |
Objective response rate – IRC-assessed | ||
Responders (%) (CR, PR) | 125 (68.3) | 37 (40.7) |
Difference in response rate (95% CI), % | 27.7 (14.7, 40.6) |
CI=confidence interval; HR=hazard ratio; NE=not estimable.
Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier plot of overall survival in study GO41944 (STARGLO, updated analysis; ITT):
Figure 2. Kaplan Meier plot of IRC-assessed progression-free survival in study GO41944 (STARGLO, updated analysis; ITT):
Across studies, of 608 patients, only 4 patients (0.7%) were negative for anti-glofitamab antibodies at baseline and became positive following treatment. Due to the limited number of patients with antibodies against glofitamab, no conclusions can be drawn concerning a potential effect of immunogenicity on efficacy or safety.
The European Medicines Agency has deferred the obligation to submit the results of studies with Columvi in one or more subsets of the paediatric population in treatment of mature B-cell neoplasms (see section 4.2 for information on paediatric use).
Non-compartmental analyses indicate that glofitamab serum concentration reaches the maximal level (Cmax) at the end of infusion and declines in a bi-exponential fashion. Glofitamab exhibits linear and dose-proportional pharmacokinetics over the dose range studied (0.005 to 30 mg) and is independent of time.
Columvi is administered as an intravenous infusion. Peak concentration of glofitamab (Cmax) was reached at the end of the infusion.
Following intravenous administration, the central volume of distribution was 3.34 L, which is close to total serum volume. The peripheral volume of distribution was 2.35 L.
The metabolism of glofitamab has not been studied. Antibodies are cleared principally by catabolism.
The glofitamab serum concentration-time data are described by a population pharmacokinetic model with two compartments, and both time-independent clearance and time-varying clearance.
The time-independent clearance pathway was estimated as 0.633 L/day and the initial time-varying clearance pathway as 0.814 L/day, with an exponential decay over time (Kdes ~1.5/day). The estimated decay half-life from the initial total clearance value to the time-independent clearance only was estimated as 0.471 days.
The effective half-life in the linear phase (i.e., after the contribution of time-varying clearance has collapsed to a negligible amount) is 7.92 days (geometric mean, 95% CI: 4.69, 11.90) based on the population pharmacokinetic analysis.
No differences in glofitamab exposure were noted in patients 65 years of age and older and those under 65 years based on population pharmacokinetic analysis.
The population pharmacokinetic analysis of glofitamab showed that creatinine clearance does not affect the pharmacokinetics of glofitamab. The pharmacokinetics of glofitamab in patients with mild or moderate renal impairment (CrCL 30 to < 90 mL/min) were similar to those in patients with normal renal function. Columvi has not been studied in patients with severe renal impairment.
Population pharmacokinetic analyses showed mild hepatic impairment does not affect the pharmacokinetics of glofitamab. The pharmacokinetics of glofitamab in patients with mild hepatic impairment (total bilirubin > ULN to ≤ 1.5 × ULN or AST > ULN) were similar to those with normal hepatic functions. Columvi has not been studied in patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment.
No clinically significant differences in the pharmacokinetics of glofitamab were observed based on age (21 years to 90 years), gender and body weight (31 kg to 148 kg).
No studies have been conducted to establish the carcinogenic potential and mutagenic potential of glofitamab.
No fertility assessments in animals have been performed to evaluate the effect of glofitamab.
No reproductive and developmental toxicity studies in animals have been performed to evaluate the effect of glofitamab. Based on low placental transfer of antibodies during the first trimester, the mechanism of action of glofitamab (B-cell depletion, target-dependent T-cell activation, and cytokine release), the available safety data with glofitamab and data on other anti-CD20 antibodies, the risk for teratogenicity is low. Prolonged B-cell depletion can lead to increased risk of opportunistic infection, which may cause foetal loss. Transient CRS associated with Columvi administration may also be harmful to the foetus (see section 4.6).
In a study in cynomolgus monkeys, animals experiencing severe CRS after a single intravenous dose of glofitamab (0.1 mg/kg) without obinutuzumab pre-treatment had erosions in the gastrointestinal tract and inflammatory cell infiltrates in spleen and sinusoids of the liver and sporadically in some other organs. These inflammatory cell infiltrates were likely secondary to cytokine-induced immune cell activation. Pre-treatment with obinutuzumab resulted in the attenuation of glofitamab-induced cytokine release and related adverse effects by depleting B cells in peripheral blood and lymphoid tissue. This allowed at least 10 times higher doses of glofitamab (1 mg/kg) in cynomolgus monkeys resulting in a Cmax of up to 3.74 times the human Cmax at the recommended 30 mg dose.
All findings with glofitamab were considered pharmacologically mediated effects and reversible. Studies longer than 4 weeks were not performed, as glofitamab was highly immunogenic in cynomolgus monkeys and led to loss of exposure and loss of the pharmacologic effect.
As all relapsed or refractory DLBCL patients to be treated have been exposed to anti-CD20 treatment before, the majority will likely have low levels of circulating B cells due to residual effects of prior anti-CD20 therapy, before treatment with obinutuzumab. Therefore, the animal model without prior rituximab (or other anti-CD20) treatment may not fully reflect the clinical context.
© All content on this website, including data entry, data processing, decision support tools, "RxReasoner" logo and graphics, is the intellectual property of RxReasoner and is protected by copyright laws. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of any part of this content without explicit written permission from RxReasoner is strictly prohibited. Any third-party content used on this site is acknowledged and utilized under fair use principles.