Source: European Medicines Agency (EU) Revision Year: 2023 Publisher: AstraZeneca AB, SE-151 85, Södertälje, Sweden
Pharmacotherapeutic group: Drugs used in diabetes. Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitors
ATC code: A10BH03
Saxagliptin is a highly potent (Ki: 1.3 nM), selective, reversible, competitive, DPP4 inhibitor. In patients with type 2 diabetes, administration of saxagliptin led to inhibition of DPP4 enzyme activity for a 24-hour period. After an oral glucose load, this DPP4 inhibition resulted in a 2- to 3-fold increase in circulating levels of active incretin hormones, including glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), decreased glucagon concentrations and increased glucose-dependent beta-cell responsiveness, which resulted in higher insulin and C-peptide concentrations. The rise in insulin from pancreatic beta-cells and the decrease in glucagon from pancreatic alpha-cells were associated with lower fasting glucose concentrations and reduced glucose excursion following an oral glucose load or a meal. Saxagliptin improves glycaemic control by reducing fasting and postprandial glucose concentrations in patients with type 2 diabetes.
In randomised, controlled, double-blind clinical trials (including developmental and postmarketing experience), over 17,000 patients with type 2 diabetes have been treated with saxagliptin.
A total of 4,148 patients with type 2 diabetes, including 3,021 patients treated with, saxagliptin were randomised in 6 double-blind, controlled clinical safety and efficacy studies conducted to evaluate the effects of saxagliptin on glycaemic control. Treatment with saxagliptin 5 mg once daily produced clinically relevant and statistically significant improvements in haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and postprandial glucose (PPG) compared to placebo in monotherapy, in combination with metformin (initial or add-on therapy), in combination with a sulphonylurea, and in combination with a thiazolidinedione (see Table 2). There was also no apparent change in body weight associated with saxagliptin. Reductions in HbA1c were seen across subgroups including gender, age, race, and baseline body mass index (BMI) and higher baseline HbA1c was associated with a greater adjusted mean change from baseline with saxagliptin.
Two double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of 24-week duration were conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of saxagliptin monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes. In both studies, once-daily treatment with saxagliptin provided significant improvements in HbA1c (see Table 2). The findings of these studies were confirmed with two subsequent 24-week regional (Asian) monotherapy studies comparing saxagliptin 5 mg with placebo.
An add-on to metformin placebo-controlled study of 24-week duration was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of saxagliptin in combination with metformin in patients with inadequate glycaemic control (HbA1c 7-10%) on metformin alone. Saxagliptin (n=186) provided significant improvements in HbA1c, FPG, and PPG compared to placebo (n=175). Improvements in HbA1c, PPG, and FPG following treatment with saxagliptin 5 mg plus metformin were sustained up to Week 102. The HbA1c change for saxagliptin 5 mg plus metformin (n=31) compared to placebo plus metformin (n=15) was -0.8% at Week 102.
A 52-week study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of saxagliptin 5 mg in combination with metformin (428 patients) compared with a sulphonylurea (glipizide, 5 mg titrated as needed to 20 mg, mean dose of 15 mg) in combination with metformin (430 patients) in 858 patients with inadequate glycaemic control (HbA1c 6.5%-10%) on metformin alone. The mean metformin dose was approximately 1900 mg in each treatment group. After 52 weeks, the saxagliptin and glipizide groups had similar mean reductions from baseline in HbA1c in the per-protocol analysis (-0.7% vs. –0.8%, respectively, mean baseline HbA1c of 7.5% for both groups). The intent-to-treat analysis showed consistent results. The reduction in FPG was slightly less in the saxagliptin-group and there were more discontinuations (3.5% vs. 1.2%) due to lack of efficacy based on FPG criteria during the first 24 weeks of the study. Saxagliptin also resulted in a significantly lower proportion of patients with hypoglycaemia, 3% (19 events in 13 subjects) vs. 36.3% (750 events in 156 patients) for glipizide. Patients treated with saxagliptin exhibited a significant decrease from baseline in body weight compared to a weight gain in patients administered glipizide (-1.1 vs. +1.1 kg).
An 18-week study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of saxagliptin 5 mg in combination with metformin (403 patients), compared with sitagliptin 100 mg in combination with metformin (398 patients) in 801 patients with inadequate glycaemic control on metformin alone. After 18 weeks, saxagliptin was non-inferior to sitagliptin in mean reduction from baseline in HbA1c in both the per-protocol and the full analysis sets. The reductions from baseline in HbA1c respectively for saxagliptin and sitagliptin in the primary per-protocol analysis were -0.5% (mean and median) and -0.6% (mean and median). In the confirmatory full analysis set, mean reductions were -0.4% and -0.6% respectively for saxagliptin and sitagliptin, with median reductions of -0.5% for both groups.
A 24-week study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of saxagliptin 5 mg in combination with metformin as initial combination therapy in treatment-naïve patients with inadequate glycaemic control (HbA1c 8-12%). Initial therapy with the combination of saxagliptin 5 mg plus metformin (n=306) provided significant improvements in HbA1c, FPG, and PPG compared to with either saxagliptin (n=317) or metformin alone (n=313) as initial therapy. Reductions in HbA1c from baseline to Week 24 were observed in all evaluated subgroups defined by baseline HbA1c, with greater reductions observed in patients with a baseline HbA1c ≥10% (see Table 2). Improvements in HbA1c, PPG and FPG following initial therapy with saxagliptin 5 mg plus metformin were sustained up to Week 76. The HbA1c change for saxagliptin 5 mg plus metformin (n=177) compared to metformin plus placebo (n=147) was -0.5% at Week 76.
An add-on placebo-controlled study of 24-week duration was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of saxagliptin in combination with glibenclamide in patients with inadequate glycaemic control at enrollment (HbA1c 7.5-10%) on a sub-maximal dose of glibenclamide alone. Saxagliptin in combination with a fixed, intermediate dose of a sulphonylurea (glibenclamide 7.5 mg) was compared to titration to a higher dose of glibenclamide (approximately 92% of patients in the placebo plus glibenclamide group were uptitrated to a final total daily dose of 15 mg). Saxagliptin (n=250) provided significant improvements in HbA1c, FPG, and PPG compared to titration to a higher dose of glibenclamide (n=264). Improvements in HbA1c and PPG following treatment with saxagliptin 5 mg were sustained up to Week 76. The HbA1c change for saxagliptin 5 mg (n=56) compared to uptitrated glibenclamide plus placebo (n=27) was -0.7% at Week 76.
A total of 455 patients with type 2 diabetes participated in a 24-week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of saxagliptin in combination with a stable dose of insulin (baseline mean: 54.2 Units) in patients with inadequate glycaemic control (HbA1c ≥7.5% and ≤11%) on insulin alone (n=141) or on insulin in combination with a stable dose of metformin (n=314). Saxagliptin 5 mg add-on to insulin with or without metformin provided significant improvements after 24 weeks in HbA1c and PPG compared with placebo add-on to insulin with or without metformin. Similar HbA1c reductions versus placebo were achieved for patients receiving saxagliptin 5 mg add-on to insulin regardless of metformin use (−0.4% for both subgroups). Improvements from baseline HbA1c were sustained in the saxagliptin add-on to insulin group compared to the placebo add-on to insulin group with or without metformin at Week 52. The HbA1c change for the saxagliptin group (n=244) compared to placebo (n=124) was -0.4% at Week 52.
A placebo-controlled study of 24-week duration was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of saxagliptin in combination with a thiazolidinedione (TZD) in patients with inadequate glycaemic control (HbA1c 7-10.5%) on TZD alone. Saxagliptin (n=183) provided significant improvements in HbA1c, FPG, and PPG compared to placebo (n=180). Improvements in HbA1c, PPG and FPG following treatment with saxagliptin 5 mg were sustained up to Week 76. The HbA1c change for saxagliptin 5 mg (n=82) compared to TZD plus placebo (n=53) was -0.9% at Week 76.
A total of 257 patients with type 2 diabetes participated in a 24-week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of saxagliptin (5 mg once daily) in combination with metformin plus sulphonylurea (SU) in patients with inadequate glycemic control (HbA1c ≥7% and ≤10%). Saxagliptin (n=127) provided significant improvements in HbA1c and PPG compared with the placebo (n=128). The HbA1c change for saxagliptin compared to placebo was -0.7% at Week 24.
A 24-week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus compared saxagliptin 5 mg with placebo as add-on therapy in individuals with HbA1c 7-10.5% treated with dapagliflozin (a SGLT2-inhibtor) and metformin. Patients who completed the initial 24-week study period were eligible to enter a controlled 28-week long-term study extension (52 weeks).
Individuals treated with saxagliptin added to dapagliflozin and metformin (n=153) achieved statistically significantly (p-value<0.0001) greater reductions in HbA1c versus the group with placebo added to dapagliflozin plus metformin (n=162) at 24 weeks (see Table 2). The effect on HbA1c observed at Week 24 was sustained at Week 52. The safety profile of saxagliptin added to dapagliflozin plus metformin in the long-term treatment period was consistent with that observed in the 24-week treatment period in this study and in the trial in which saxagliptin and dapagliflozin were given concomitantly as add-on therapy to patients treated with metformin (described below).
The proportion of patients achieving HbA1c <7% at Week 24 was higher in the saxagliptin 5 mg plus dapagliflozin plus metformin group 35.3% (95% CI [28.2, 42.4]) compared to the placebo plus dapagliflozin plus metformin group 23.1% (95% CI [16.9, 29.3]). The effect in HbA1c observed at Week 24 was sustained at Week 52.
Table 2. Key efficacy results of Onglyza 5 mg per day in placebo-controlled monotherapy trials and in add-on combination therapy trials:
| Mean baseline HbA1c (%) | Mean change2 from baseline HbA1c (%) at Week 24 | Placebo-corrected mean change in HbA1c () at Week 24 (95 CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MONOTHERAPY STUDIES | |||
| Study CV181011 (n=103) | 8,0 | -0,5 | -0,6 (-0,9, -0,4)3 |
| Study CV181038 (n=69) | 7,9 | -0,7 (πρωί) | -0.4 (-0,7, -0,1)4 |
| Study CV181038 (n=70) | 7,9 | -0,6 (βράδυ) | -0.4 (-0,6, -0,1)5 |
| ADD-ON/COMBINATION STUDIES | |||
| Study CV181014: add-on to metformin (n=186) | 8, | 1 -0,7 | -0.8 (-1,0, -0,6)3 |
| Study CV181040: add-on to SU1 (n=250) | 8,5 | -0,6 | -0,7 (-0,9, -0,6)3 |
| Study D1680L00006: add-on to metformin plus SU (n=257) | 8,4 | -0,7 | -0,7(-0,9, -0,5)3 |
| Study CV181013: add-on to TZD (n=183) | 8,4 | -0,9 | -0,6 (-0,8, -0,4)3 |
| Study CV181039: initial combination with metformin6 | |||
| Overall population (n=306) | 9,4 | -2,5 | -0,5 (-0,7, -0,4)7 |
| Baseline HbA1c ≥10% stratum (n=107) | 10,8 | -3,3 | -0,6 (-0,9, -0,3)8 |
| Study CV181168: sequential add-on to dapagliflozin + metformin (n=315) | 7,9 | -0,5 | -0,4 (-0,5, -0,2)9 |
| Study CV181057: add-on to insulin (+/-metformin) Overall population (n=300) | 8,7 | -0,7 | -0,4 (-0,6, -0,2)3 |
n=Randomised patients (primary efficacy-intention-to-treat analysis) with data available.
1 Placebo group had uptitration of glibenclamide from 7.5 to 15 mg total daily dose.
2 Adjusted mean change from baseline adjusted for baseline value (ANCOVA).
3 p<0.0001 compared to placebo.
4 p=0.0059 compared to placebo.
5 p=0.0157 compared to placebo.
6 Metformin was uptitrated from 500 to 2000 mg per day as tolerated.
7 Mean HbA1c change is the difference between the saxagliptin+metformin and metformin alone groups (p<0.0001).
8 Mean HbA1c change is the difference between the saxagliptin+metformin and metformin alone groups.
9 Mean HbA1c change is the difference between the saxagliptin+dapagliflozin+metformin and dapagliflozin+metformin groups (p< 0.0001).
Saxagliptin and dapagliflozin add-on to metformin therapy A total of 534 adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and inadequate glycaemic control on metformin alone (HbA1c 8%-12%), participated in this 24-week randomised, double-blind, active comparator-controlled trial to compare the combination of saxagliptin and dapagliflozin added concurrently to metformin, versus saxagliptin or dapagliflozin added to metformin. Patients were randomised to one of three double-blind treatment groups to receive saxagliptin 5 mg and dapagliflozin 10 mg added to metformin, saxagliptin 5 mg and placebo added to metformin, or dapagliflozin 10 mg and placebo added to metformin.
The saxagliptin and dapagliflozin group achieved significantly greater reductions in HbA1c versus either the saxagliptin group or dapagliflozin group at 24 weeks (see Table 3).
Table 3. HbA1c at Week 24 in active-controlled study comparing the combination of saxagliptin and dapagliflozin added concurrently to metformin with either saxagliptin or dapagliflozin added to metformin:
| Efficacy parameter | Saxagliptin 5 mg + dapagliflozin 10 mg + metformin N=1792 | Saxagliptin 5 mg + metformin N=1762 | Dapagliflozin 10 mg + metformin N=1792 |
|---|---|---|---|
| HbA1c (%) at week 241 | |||
| Baseline (mean) | 8,93 | 9,03 | 8,87 |
| Change from baseline (adjusted mean3) (95% Confidence interval [CI]) | −1,47 (−1,62, −1,31) | −0,88 (−1,03, −0,72) | −1,20 (−1,35, −1,04) |
| Difference from saxagliptin + metformin (adjusted mean3) (95% CI) | −0,594 (−0,81, −0,37) | - | - |
| Difference from dapagliflozin + metformin (adjusted mean3) (95% CI) | −0,275 (−0,48, −0,05) | - | - |
1 LRM = Longitudinal repeated measures (using values prior to rescue).
2 Randomised and treated patients with baseline and at least 1 post baseline efficacy measurement.
3 Least squares mean adjusted for baseline value.
4 p-value<0.0001.
5 p-value=0.0166.
In the saxagliptin and dapagliflozin combination group, 41.4% (95% CI [34.5, 48.2]) of patients achieved HbA1c levels of less than 7% compared to 18.3% (95% CI [13.0, 23.5]) of patients in the saxagliptin group and 22.2% (95% CI [16.1, 28.3]) of patients in the dapagliflozin group.
A 12-week, multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted to evaluate the treatment effect of saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily compared with placebo in 170 patients (85 patients on saxagliptin and 85 on placebo) with type 2 diabetes (HbA1c 7.0-11%) and renal impairment (moderate [n=90]; severe [n=41]; or ESRD [n=39]). In this study, 98.2% of the patients received other antihyperglycaemic treatments (75.3% on insulin and 31.2% on oral antihyperglycaemics; some received both). Saxagliptin significantly decreased HbA1c compared with placebo; the HbA1c change for saxagliptin was -0.9% at Week 12 (HbA1c change of -0.4% for placebo). Improvements in HbA1c following treatment with saxagliptin 2.5 mg were sustained up to Week 52, however, the number of patients who completed 52 weeks without modification of other antihyperglycaemic treatment was low (26 subjects in the saxagliptin group versus 34 subjects in the placebo group). The incidence of confirmed hypoglycaemic events was somewhat higher in the saxagliptin group (9.4%) versus placebo group (4.7%) although the number of subjects with any hypoglycaemic event did not differ between the treatment groups. There was no adverse effect on renal function as determined by estimated glomerular filtration rate or CrCL at Week 12 and Week 52.
SAVOR was a CV outcome trial in 16,492 patients with HbA1c ≥6.5% and <12% (12959 with established CV disease; 3533 with multiple risk factors only) who were randomised to saxagliptin (n=8280) or placebo (n=8212) added to regional standards of care for HbA1c and CV risk factors. The study population included those ≥65 years (n=8561) and ≥75 years (n=2330), with normal or mild renal impairment (n=13,916) as well as moderate (n=2240) or severe (n=336) renal impairment.
The primary safety (noninferiority) and efficacy (superiority) endpoint was a composite endpoint consisting of the time-to-first occurrence of any of the following major adverse CV events (MACE): CV death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal ischaemic stroke.
After a mean follow up of 2 years, the trial met its primary safety endpoint demonstrating saxagliptin does not increase the cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes compared to placebo when added to current background therapy.
No benefit was observed for MACE or all-cause mortality.
Table 4. Primary and Secondary Clinical Endpoints by Treatment Group in the SAVOR Study*:
| Endpoint | Saxagliptin (N=8280) | Placebo (N=8212) | Hazard Ratio (95% CI)† | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subjects with events n (%) | Event rate per 100 patient-yrs | Subjects with events n (%) | Event rate per 100 patient-yrs | ||
| Primary composite endpoint: MACE | 613 (7,4) | 3,76 | 609 (7,4) | 3,77 | 1,00 (0,89, 1,12)‡,§,# |
| Secondary composite endpoint: MACE plus | 1059 (12,8) | 6,72 | 1034 (12,6) | 6,60 | 1,02 (0,94, 1,11)¶ |
| All-cause mortality | 420 (5,1) | 2,50 | 378 (4,6) | 2,26 | 1,11 (0,96, 1,27)¶ |
* Intent-to-treat population
† Hazard ratio adjusted for baseline renal function category and baseline CVD risk category.
‡ p-value <0.001 for noninferiority (based on HR <1.3) compared to placebo.
§ p-value = 0.99 for superiority (based on HR <1.0) compared to placebo.
# Events accumulated consistently over time, and the event rates for Onglyza and placebo did not diverge notably over time.
¶ Significance not tested.
One component of the secondary composite endpoint, hospitalisation for heart failure, occurred at a greater rate in the saxagliptin group (3.5%) compared with the placebo group (2.8%), with nominal statistical significance favouring placebo [HR = 1.27; (95% CI 1.07, 1.51); P = 0.007]. Clinically relevant factors predictive of increased relative risk with saxagliptin treatment could not be definitively identified. Subjects at higher risk for hospitalisation for heart failure, irrespective of treatment assignment, could be identified by known risk factors for heart failure such as baseline history of heart failure or impaired renal function. However, subjects on saxagliptin with a history of heart failure or impaired renal function at baseline were not at an increased risk relative to placebo for the primary or secondary composite endpoints or all-cause mortality.
Another secondary endpoint, all-cause mortality, occurred at a rate of 5.1% in the saxagliptin group and 4.6% in the placebo group (see Table 4). CV deaths were balanced across the treatment groups. There was a numerical imbalance in non-CV death, with more events on saxagliptin (1.8%) than placebo (1.4%) [HR = 1.27; (95% CI 1.00, 1.62); P = 0.051].
A1C was lower with saxagliptin compared to placebo in an exploratory analysis.
The European Medicines Agency has deferred the obligation to submit the results of studies with Onglyza in one or more subsets of the paediatric population in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (see section 4.2 for information on paediatric use).
In the SAVOR study subgroups over 65 and over 75 years of age, efficacy and safety were consistent with the overall study population.
GENERATION was a 52-week glycaemic control study in 720 elderly patients, the mean age was 72.6 years; 433 subjects (60.1%) were <75 years of age, and 287 subjects (39.9%) were ≥75 years of age. Primary endpoint was the proportion of patients reaching HbA1c <7% without confirmed or severe hypoglycaemia. There appeared to be no difference in percentage responders: 37.9% (saxagliptin) and 38.2% (glimepiride) achieved the primary endpoint. A lower proportion of patients in the saxagliptin group (44.7%) compared to the glimepiride group (54.7%) achieved an HbA1c target of 7.0%. A lower proportion of patients in the saxagliptin group (1.1%) compared to the glimepiride group (15.3%) experienced a confirmed or severe hypoglycaemic event.
The pharmacokinetics of saxagliptin and its major metabolite were similar in healthy subjects and in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Saxagliptin was rapidly absorbed after oral administration in the fasted state, with maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) of saxagliptin and its major metabolite attained within 2 and 4 hours (Tmax), respectively. The Cmax and AUC values of saxagliptin and its major metabolite increased proportionally with the increment in the saxagliptin dose, and this dose-proportionality was observed in doses up to 400 mg. Following a 5 mg single oral dose of saxagliptin to healthy subjects, the mean plasma AUC values for saxagliptin and its major metabolite were 78 ng·h/ml and 214 ng·h/ml, respectively. The corresponding plasma Cmax values were 24 ng/ml and 47 ng/ml, respectively. The intra-subject coefficients of variation for saxagliptin Cmax and AUC were less than 12%.
The inhibition of plasma DPP4 activity by saxagliptin for at least 24 hours after oral administration of saxagliptin is due to high potency, high affinity, and extended binding to the active site.
Food had relatively modest effects on the pharmacokinetics of saxagliptin in healthy subjects. Administration with food (a high-fat meal) resulted in no change in saxagliptin Cmax and a 27% increase in AUC compared with the fasted state. The time for saxagliptin to reach Cmax (Tmax) was increased by approximately 0.5 hours with food compared with the fasted state. These changes were not considered to be clinically meaningful.
The in vitro protein binding of saxagliptin and its major metabolite in human serum is negligible. Thus, changes in blood protein levels in various disease states (e.g. renal or hepatic impairment) are not expected to alter the disposition of saxagliptin.
The biotransformation of saxagliptin is primarily mediated by cytochrome P450 3A4/5 (CYP3A4/5). The major metabolite of saxagliptin is also a selective, reversible, competitive DPP4 inhibitor, half as potent as saxagliptin.
The mean plasma terminal half-life (t1/2) values for saxagliptin and its major metabolite are 2.5 hours and 3.1 hours respectively, and the mean t1/2 value for plasma DPP4 inhibition was 26.9 hours. Saxagliptin is eliminated by both renal and hepatic pathways. Following a single 50 mg dose of 14C-saxagliptin, 24%, 36%, and 75% of the dose was excreted in the urine as saxagliptin, its major metabolite, and total radioactivity respectively. The average renal clearance of saxagliptin (~230 ml/min) was greater than the average estimated glomerular filtration rate (~120 ml/min), suggesting some active renal excretion. For the major metabolite, renal clearance values were comparable to estimated glomerular filtration rate. A total of 22% of the administered radioactivity was recovered in faeces representing the fraction of the saxagliptin dose excreted in bile and/or unabsorbed medicinal product from the gastrointestinal tract.
The Cmax and AUC of saxagliptin and its major metabolite increased proportionally to the saxagliptin dose. No appreciable accumulation of either saxagliptin or its major metabolite was observed with repeated once-daily dosing at any dose level. No dose- and time-dependence was observed in the clearance of saxagliptin and its major metabolite over 14 days of once-daily dosing with saxagliptin at doses ranging from 2.5 mg to 400 mg.
A single-dose, open-label study was conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of a 10 mg oral dose of saxagliptin in subjects with varying degrees of chronic renal impairment compared to subjects with normal renal function. The study included patients with renal impairment classified on the basis of creatinine clearance as mild (approximately GFR ≥45 to <90 mL/min), moderate (approximately GFR ≥30 to <45 mL/min), or severe (approximately GFR <30 mL/min), as well as patients with ESRD on haemodialysis.
The degree of renal impairment did not affect the Cmax of saxagliptin or its major metabolite. In subjects with mild renal impairment, the mean AUC values of saxagliptin and its major metabolite were 1.2- and 1.7-fold higher, respectively, than mean AUC values in subjects with normal renal function. Because increases of this magnitude are not clinically relevant, dose adjustment in patients with mild renal impairment is not recommended. In subjects with moderate or severe renal impairment or in subjects with ESRD on haemodialysis, the AUC values of saxagliptin and its major metabolite were up to 2.1- and 4.5-fold higher, respectively, than AUC values in subjects with normal renal function.
In subjects with mild (Child-Pugh Class A), moderate (Child-Pugh Class B), or severe (Child-Pugh Class C) hepatic impairment the exposures to saxagliptin were 1.1-, 1.4- and 1.8-fold higher, respectively, and the exposures to BMS-510849 were 22%, 7%, and 33% lower, respectively, than those observed in healthy subjects.
Elderly patients (65-80 years) had about 60% higher saxagliptin AUC than young patients (18-40 years). This is not considered clinically meaningful, therefore, no dose adjustment for Onglyza is recommended on the basis of age alone.
In cynomolgus monkeys saxagliptin produced reversible skin lesions (scabs, ulcerations and necrosis) in extremities (tail, digits, scrotum and/or nose) at doses ≥3 mg/kg/day. The no effect level (NOEL) for the lesions is 1 and 2 times the human exposure of saxagliptin and the major metabolite respectively, at the recommended human dose of 5 mg/day (RHD).
The clinical relevance of the skin lesions is not known, however, clinical correlates to skin lesions in monkeys have not been observed in human clinical trials of saxagliptin.
Immune related findings of minimal, nonprogressive, lymphoid hyperplasia in spleen, lymph nodes and bone marrow with no adverse sequelae have been reported in all species tested at exposures starting from 7 times the RHD.
Saxagliptin produced gastrointestinal toxicity in dogs, including bloody/mucoid faeces and enteropathy at higher doses with a NOEL 4 and 2 times the human exposure for saxagliptin and the major metabolite, respectively, at RHD.
Saxagliptin was not genotoxic in a conventional battery of genotoxicity studies in vitro and in vivo. No carcinogenic potential was observed in two-year carcinogenicity assays with mice and rats.
Effects on fertility were observed in male and female rats at high doses producing overt signs of toxicity. Saxagliptin was not teratogenic at any doses evaluated in rats or rabbits. At high doses in rats, saxagliptin caused reduced ossification (a developmental delay) of the foetal pelvis and decreased foetal body weight (in the presence of maternal toxicity), with a NOEL 303 and 30 times the human exposure for saxagliptin and the major metabolite, respectively, at RHD. In rabbits, the effects of saxagliptin were limited to minor skeletal variations observed only at maternally toxic doses (NOEL 158 and 224 times the human exposure for saxagliptin and the major metabolite, respectively at RHD). In a pre- and postnatal developmental study in rats, saxagliptin caused decreased pup weight at maternally toxic doses, with NOEL 488 and 45 times the human exposure for saxagliptin and the major metabolite, respectively at RHD. The effect on offspring body weights were noted until postnatal day 92 and 120 in females and males, respectively.
© All content on this website, including data entry, data processing, decision support tools, "RxReasoner" logo and graphics, is the intellectual property of RxReasoner and is protected by copyright laws. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of any part of this content without explicit written permission from RxReasoner is strictly prohibited. Any third-party content used on this site is acknowledged and utilized under fair use principles.
