REZOLSTA Film-coated tablet Ref.[51238] Active ingredients: Cobicistat Darunavir Darunavir and Cobicistat

Source: European Medicines Agency (EU)  Revision Year: 2022  Publisher: Janssen-Cilag International NV, Turnhoutseweg 30, B-2340 Beerse, Belgium

5.1. Pharmacodynamic properties

Pharmacotherapeutic group: Antivirals for systemic use, antivirals for treatment of HIV infection, combinations
ATC code: J05AR14

Mechanism of action

Darunavir is an inhibitor of the dimerisation and of the catalytic activity of the HIV-1 protease (KD of 4.5 × 10-12M). It selectively inhibits the cleavage of HIV encoded Gag-Pol polyproteins in virus infected cells, thereby preventing the formation of mature infectious virus particles.

Cobicistat is a mechanism-based inhibitor of cytochromes P450 of the CYP3A subfamily. Inhibition of CYP3A-mediated metabolism by cobicistat enhances the systemic exposure of CYP3A substrates, such as darunavir, where bioavailability is limited and half-life is shortened due to CYP3A-dependent metabolism.

Antiviral activity in vitro

Darunavir exhibits activity against laboratory strains and clinical isolates of HIV-1 and laboratory strains of HIV-2 in acutely infected T-cell lines, human peripheral blood mononuclear cells and human monocytes/macrophages with median EC50 values ranging from 1.2 to 8.5 nM (0.7 to 5.0 ng/mL). Darunavir demonstrates antiviral activity in vitro against a broad panel of HIV-1 group M (A, B, C, D, E, F, G) and group O primary isolates with EC50 values ranging from <0.1 to 4.3 nM. These EC50 values are well below the 50% cellular toxicity concentration range of 87 µM to >100 µM.

Cobicistat has no detectable antiviral activity against HIV-1 and does not antagonise the antiviral effect of darunavir.

Resistance

In vitro selection of darunavir-resistant virus from wild type HIV-1 was lengthy (>3 years). The selected viruses were unable to grow in the presence of darunavir concentrations above 400 nM. Viruses selected in these conditions and showing decreased susceptibility to darunavir (range: 23-50-fold) harboured 2 to 4 amino acid substitutions in the protease gene. The decreased susceptibility to darunavir of the emerging viruses in the selection experiment could not be explained by the emergence of these protease mutations.

The resistance profile of REZOLSTA is driven by darunavir. Cobicistat does not select any HIV resistance mutations, due to its lack of antiviral activity. The resistance profile of REZOLSTA is supported by two Phase III trials conducted with darunavir/ritonavir in treatment-naïve (ARTEMIS) and treatment-experienced (ODIN) patients and the analysis of 48 week data from trial GS-US-216-130 in treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients.

Low rates of developing resistant HIV-1 virus were observed in ART-naïve patients who are treated for the first time with REZOLSTA or darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg once daily in combination with other ART, and in ART-experienced patients with no darunavir RAMs receiving REZOLSTA or darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg once daily in combination with other ART. The table below shows the development of HIV-1 protease mutations and loss of susceptibility to HIV PIs in virologic failures at endpoint in the GS-US-216-130, ARTEMIS and ODIN trials.

 GS-US-216-130^a^ ARTEMIS^b^ ODIN^b^
Treatment-naïve
darunavir/cobicistat
800/150 mg
once daily
N=295
Treatment-experienced
darunavir/cobicistat
800/150 mg
once daily
N=18
Treatment-naïve
darunavir/ritonavir
800/100 mg
once daily
N=343
Treatment-experienced
darunavir/ritonavir
800/100 mg
once daily
N=294
Treatment-experienced
darunavir/ritonavir
600/100 mg
twice daily
N=296
Number of subjects with virologic failure and genotype data that develop mutations^c^ at endpoint, n/N
Primary
(major) PI
mutations
0/8 1/7 0/43 1/60 0/42
PI RAMs 2/8 1/7 4/43 7/60 4/42
Number of subjects with virologic failure and phenotype data that show a loss of susceptibility to PIs at endpoint compared to baseline^d^, n/N
HIV PI
darunavir 0/8 0/7 0/39 1/58 0/41
amprenavir 0/8 0/7 0/39 1/58 0/40
atazanavir 0/8 0/7 0/39 2/56 0/40
indinavir 0/8 0/7 0/39 2/57 0/40
lopinavir 0/8 0/7 0/39 1/58 0/40
saquinavir 0/8 0/7 0/39 0/56 0/40
tipranavir 0/8 0/7 0/39 0/58 0/41

a Virologic failures selected for resistance testing were defined as: never suppressed: HIV-1 RNA <1 log10 reduction from baseline and ≥50 copies/mL at week 8, confirmed at the following visit; rebound: HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL followed by confirmed HIV-1 RNA to ≥400 copies/mL or confirmed >1 log10 HIV-1 RNA increase from the nadir; discontinuations with HIV-1 RNA ≥400 copies/mL at last visit
b Virologic failures based on TLOVR non-VF censored algorithm (HIV-1 RNA >50 copies/mL)
c IAS-USA lists
d In GS-US-216-130 baseline phenotype was not available

Cross-resistance

In the virologic failures of the GS-US-216-130 trial no cross-resistance with other HIV PIs was observed. Refer to the table above for information on ARTEMIS and ODIN.

Clinical results

The antiretroviral effect of REZOLSTA is due to the darunavir component. The activity of cobicistat as a pharmacokinetic enhancer to darunavir has been demonstrated in pharmacokinetic trials. In these pharmacokinetic trials, the exposure of darunavir 800 mg boosted with cobicistat 150 mg was consistent with that observed when boosted with ritonavir 100 mg. Darunavir as a component of REZOLSTA is bioequivalent to darunavir 800 mg once daily in combination with cobicistat 150 mg once daily co-administered as single medicinal products (see section 5.2).

The evidence of efficacy of REZOLSTA once daily is based on the analysis of 48 week data from trial GS-US-216-130 in ART-naïve and ART-experienced patients, trial TMC114FD2HTX3001 in ART-naïve patients, and two Phase III trials ARTEMIS and ODIN conducted with darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg q.d. in ART-naïve and ART-experienced patients, respectively.

Description of clinical studies of REZOLSTA in adults

Efficacy of darunavir 800 mg once daily co-administered with 150 mg cobicistat once daily in ART-naïve and ART-experienced patients

GS-US-216-130 is a single-arm, open-label, Phase III trial evaluating the pharmacokinetics, safety, tolerability, and efficacy of darunavir with cobicistat in 313 HIV-1 infected adult patients (295 treatment-naïve and 18 treatment-experienced). These patients received darunavir 800 mg once daily in combination with cobicistat 150 mg once daily with an investigator selected optimised background regimen (OBR) consisting of 2 active NRTIs.

HIV-1 infected patients who were eligible for this trial had a screening genotype showing no darunavir RAMs and plasma HIV-1 RNA ≥1,000 copies/mL.

The table below shows the efficacy data of the 48 week analyses from the GS-US-216-130 trial:

 GS-US-216-130
Outcomes at week 48Treatment-naïve
darunavir/cobicistat
800/150 mg once daily
+ OBR
N=295
Treatment-experienced
darunavir/cobicistat
800/150 mg once daily
+ OBR
N=18
All subjects
darunavir/cobicistat
800/150 mg once daily
+ OBR
N=313
HIV-1 RNA
<50 copies/mLa
245 (83.1%) 8 (44.4%) 253 (80.8%)
mean HIV-1 RNA log
change from baseline
(log10 copies/mL)
-3.01-2.39-2.97
CD4+ cell count mean
change from baselineb
+174+102+170

a Imputations according to the TLOVR algorithm
b Last Observation Carried Forward imputation

Efficacy of darunavir/cobicistat fixed-dose combination 800/150 mg once daily in ART-naïve patients

TMC114FD2HTX3001 is a randomised, active-controlled, double blind, Phase III trial to evalate the efficacy and safety of darunavir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide versus darunavir/cobicistat fixed-dose combination + emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. In the darunavir/cobicistat fixed-dose combination treament arm, 363 HIV-1 infected, adult, treatment-naïve patients were treated.

HIV-1 infected patients who were eligible for this trial had a plasma HIV-1 RNA ≥1,000 copies/mL.

The table below shows the 48-week efficacy data of the darunavir/cobicistat arm of the TMC114FD2HTX3001 trial:

 TMC114FD2HTX3001 (darunavir/cobicistat arm)
Outcomes at week 48Treatment-naïve
darunavir/cobicistat 800/150 mg once daily
+ emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate
N=363
HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mLa 321 (88.4%)
Virologic failurea 12 (3.3%)
No virologic data in 48-week
windowa
30 (8.3%)
CD4+ cell count mean
change from baselineb
+173.8

a Imputations according to the Snapshot algorithm.
b Non completer is failure imputation: patients who discontinued prematurely are imputed with a change equal to 0

Description of clinical studies of darunavir/ritonavir in adults

Efficacy of darunavir 800 mg once daily co-administered with 100 mg ritonavir once daily in ART-naïve patients

The evidence of efficacy of darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg once daily is based on the analyses of 192 week data from the randomised, controlled, open-label Phase III trial ARTEMIS in antiretroviral treatment-naïve HIV-1 infected patients comparing darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg once daily with lopinavir/ritonavir 800/200 mg per day (given as a twice-daily or as a once-daily regimen). Both arms used a fixed background regimen consisting of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300 mg once daily and emtricitabine 200 mg once daily.

The table below shows the efficacy data of the 48 week and 96 week analyses from the ARTEMIS trial:

 ARTEMIS
Week 48a Week 96b
Outcomes darunavir/
ritonavir
800/100 mg
once daily
N=343
lopinavir/
ritonavir
800/200 mg
per day
N=346
Treatment
difference
(95% CI of
difference)
darunavir/
ritonavir
800/100 mg
once daily
N=343
lopinavir/
ritonavir
800/200 mg
per day
N=346
Treatment
difference
(95% CI of
difference)
HIV-1 RNA
<50 copies/mLc
83.7%
(287)
78.3%
(271)
5.3%
(-0.5; 11.2)d
79.0%
(271)
70.8%
(245)
8.2%
(1.7; 14.7)d
All patients      
With baseline
HIV-RNA
<100,000
85.8%
(194/226)
84.5%
(191/226)
1.3%
(-5.2; 7.9)d
80.5%
(182/226)
75.2%
(170/226)
5.3%
(-2.3; 13.0)d
With baseline
HIV-RNA
≥100,000
79.5%
(93/117)
66.7%
(80/120)
12.8%
(1.6; 24.1)d
76.1%
(89/117)
62.5%
(75/120)
13.6%
(1.9; 25.3)d
With baseline
CD4+ cell
count <200
79.4%
(112/141)
70.3%
(104/148)
9.2%
(-0.8; 19.2)d
78.7%
(111/141)
64.9%
(96/148)
13.9%
(3.5; 24.2)d
With baseline
CD4+ cell
count ≥200
86.6%
(175/202)
84.3%
(167/198)
2.3%
(-4.6; 9.2)d
79.2%
(160/202)
75.3%
(149/198)
4.0%
(-4.3; 12.2)d
median CD4+ cell
count change
from baseline
(x 106/L)e
+137+141+171+188

a Data based on analyses at week 48
b Data based on analyses at week 96
c Imputations according to the TLOVR algorithm
d Based on normal approximation to the difference in % response
e Non-completer is failure imputation: patients who discontinued prematurely are imputed with a change equal to 0

Non-inferiority in virologic response to the darunavir/ritonavir treatment, defined as the percentage of patients with plasma HIV-1 RNA level <50 copies/mL, was demonstrated (at the pre-defined 12% non-inferiority margin) for both Intent-To-Treat (ITT) and On Protocol (OP) populations in the 48 week analysis. These results were confirmed in the analyses of data at 96 weeks of treatment in the ARTEMIS trial. These results were sustained up to 192 weeks of treatment in the ARTEMIS trial.

Efficacy of darunavir 800 mg once daily co-administered with 100 mg ritonavir once daily in ART-experienced patients

ODIN is a Phase III, randomised, open-label trial comparing darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg once daily versus darunavir/ritonavir 600/100 mg twice daily in ART-experienced HIV-1 infected patients with screening genotype resistance testing showing no darunavir RAMs (i.e. V11I, V32I, L33F, I47V, I50V, I54M, I54L, T74P, L76V, I84V, L89V) and a screening HIV-1 RNA >1,000 copies/mL. Efficacy analysis is based on 48 weeks of treatment (see table below). Both arms used an optimised background regimen (OBR) of ≥2 NRTIs.

 ODIN
Week 48
Outcomes darunvir/ritonavir
800/100 mg once daily
+ OBR
N=294
darunvir/ritonavir
600/100 mg twice
daily + OBR
N=296
Treatment difference
(95% CI of difference)
HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mLa 72.1% (212) 70.9% (210) 1.2% (-6.1; 8.5)b
With Baseline
HIV-1 RNA (copies/mL)
   
<100,000
≥100,000
77.6% (198/255)
35.9% (14/39)
73.2% (194/265)
51.6% (16/31)
4.4% (-3.0; 11.9)
-15.7% (-39.2; 7.7)
With Baseline CD4+ cell
count (x 106/L)
   
≥100
<100
75.1% (184/245)
57.1% (28/49)
72.5% (187/258)
60.5% (23/38)
2.6% (-5.1; 10.3)
-3.4% (-24.5; 17.8)
With HIV-1 clade    
Type B
Type AE
Type C
Otherc
70.4% (126/179)
90.5% (38/42)
72.7% (32/44)
55.2% (16/29)
64.3% (128/199)
91.2% (31/34)
78.8% (26/33)
83.3% (25/30)
6.1% (-3.4; 15.6)
-0.7% (-14.0; 12.6)
-6.1% (-2.6; 13.7)
-28.2% (-51.0; -5.3)
mean CD4+ cell count
change from baseline
(x 106/L)e
+108+112-5d (-25; 16)

a Imputations according to the TLOVR algorithm
b Based on a normal approximation of the difference in % response
c Clades A1, D, F1, G, K, CRF02_AG, CRF12_BF, and CRF06_CPX
d Difference in means
e Last Observation Carried Forward imputation

At 48 weeks, virologic response, defined as the percentage of patients with plasma HIV-1 RNA level <50 copies/mL, with darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg once daily treatment was demonstrated to be non-inferior (at the pre-defined 12% non-inferiority margin) compared to darunavir/ritonavir 600/100 mg twice daily for both ITT and OP populations.

REZOLSTA should not be used in patients with one or more darunavir resistance associated mutations (DRV-RAMs) or HIV-1 RNA ≥ 100,000 copies/mL or CD4+ cell count <100 cells x 106/L (see sections 4.2 and 4.4). Limited data is available in patients with HIV-1 clades other than B.

Paediatric population

The use of REZOLSTA in adolescent patients from the age of 12 years to less than 18 years, and weighing at least 40 kg is supported by adult trials and by trial GS-US-216-0128 in HIV-1 infected adolescents evaluating components of REZOLSTA. For additional supportive information, refer to the Summary of Product Characteristics of darunavir and cobicistat.

In the open-label, Phase II/III trial GS-US-216-0128, the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of darunavir 800 mg and cobicistat 150 mg (administered as separate tablets) and at least 2 NRTIs were evaluated in 7 HIV-1 infected, treatment-experienced, virologically suppressed adolescents (see section 5.2). Patients were on a stable antiretroviral regimen (for at least 3 months), consisting of darunavir adminstered with ritonavir, combined with 2 NRTIs. They were switched from ritonavir to cobicistat 150 mg once daily and continued darunavir (N=7) and 2 NRTIs.

Virologic outcome in ART-experienced, virologically suppressed adolescents at week 48:

GS-US-216-0128
Outcomes at week 48 Darunavir/cobicistat + at least 2 NRTIs
(N=7)
HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL per FDA Snapshot
Approach
85.7% (6)
CD4+ percent median change from baselinea -6.1%
CD4+ cell count median change from baselinea -342 cells/mm³

a No imputation (observed data).

The European Medicines Agency has deferred the obligation to submit the results of studies with REZOLSTA in one or more subsets of the paediatric population in the condition of treatment of HIV-1 infection.

5.2. Pharmacokinetic properties

Darunavir exposure was shown to be comparable in a bioavailability trial between REZOLSTA and darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg q.d. at steady-state and fed conditions in healthy subjects. The bioequivalence between REZOLSTA and darunavir/cobicistat 800/150 mg co-administered as single agents was established under fed and fasted conditions in healthy subjects.

Absorption

Darunavir

The absolute oral bioavailability of a single 600 mg dose of darunavir alone is approximately 37%.

Darunavir was rapidly absorbed following oral administration of REZOLSTA in healthy volunteers. Maximum plasma concentration of darunavir in the presence of cobicistat is generally achieved within 3 to 4.5 hours. Following oral administration of REZOLSTA in healthy volunteers, maximum plasma concentrations of cobicistat were observed 2 to 5 hours post-dose.

When administered with food, the relative exposure of darunavir is 1.7-fold higher as compared to intake without food. Therefore, REZOLSTA tablets should be taken with food. The type of food does not affect exposure to REZOLSTA.

Distribution

Darunavir

Darunavir is approximately 95% bound to plasma protein. Darunavir binds primarily to plasma α1-acid glycoprotein.

Following intravenous administration, the volume of distribution of darunavir alone was 88.1 ± 59.0 L (Mean ± SD) and increased to 131 ± 49.9 L (Mean ± SD) in the presence of 100 mg twice-daily ritonavir.

Cobicistat

Cobicistat is 97 to 98% bound to human plasma proteins and the mean plasma to blood-drug concentration ratio was approximately 2.

Biotransformation

Darunavir

In vitro experiments with human liver microsomes (HLMs) indicate that darunavir primarily undergoes oxidative metabolism. Darunavir is extensively metabolised by the hepatic CYP system and almost exclusively by isozyme CYP3A4. A 14C-darunavir trial in healthy volunteers showed that a majority of the radioactivity in plasma after a single 400/100 mg darunavir with ritonavir dose was due to the parent active substance. At least 3 oxidative metabolites of darunavir have been identified in humans; all showed activity that was at least 10-fold less than the activity of darunavir against wild type HIV.

Cobicistat

Cobicistat is metabolised via CYP3A (major)- and CYP2D6 (minor)-mediated oxidation and does not undergo glucuronidation. Following oral administration of 14C-cobicistat, 99% of circulating radioactivity in plasma was unchanged cobicistat. Low levels of metabolites are observed in urine and faeces and do not contribute to the CYP3A inhibitory activity of cobicistat.

Elimination

Darunavir

After a 400/100 mg 14C-darunavir with ritonavir dose, approximately 79.5% and 13.9% of the administered dose of 14C-darunavir could be retrieved in faeces and urine, respectively. Unchanged darunavir accounted for approximately 41.2% and 7.7% of the administered dose in faeces and urine, respectively. The terminal elimination half-life of darunavir was approximately 15 hours when combined with ritonavir. The intravenous clearance of darunavir alone (150 mg) and in the presence of low dose ritonavir was 32.8 L/h and 5.9 L/h, respectively.

Cobicistat

Following oral administration of 14C-cobicistat, 86% and 8.2% of the dose were recovered in faeces and urine, respectively. The median terminal plasma half-life of cobicistat following administration of REZOLSTA is approximately 3-4 hours.

Special populations

Paediatric population

Available pharmacokinetic data for the different components of REZOLSTA indicate there were no clinically relevant differences in exposure between adults and adolescents. In addition, the pharmacokinetics of darunavir 800 mg co-administered with cobicistat 150 mg in paediatric patients have been studied in 7 adolescents aged 12 to less than 18 years, weighing at least 40 kg who received darunavir 800 mg co-administered with cobicistat 150 mg in Study GS-US-216-0128. The geometric mean adolescent exposure (AUCtau) was similar for darunavir and increased 19% for cobicistat compared to exposures achieved in adults who received darunavir 800 mg co-administered with cobicistat 150 mg in Study GS-US-216-0130. The difference observed for cobicistat was not considered clinically relevant.

Elderly

Darunavir:

Limited information is available in this population. Population pharmacokinetic analysis in HIV infected patients showed that darunavir pharmacokinetics are not considerably different in the age range (18 to 75 years) evaluated in HIV infected patients (n=12, age 65 years) (see section 4.4). However, only limited data were available in patients above the age of 65 years.

Cobicistat:

Pharmacokinetics of cobicistat have not been fully evaluated in older people (65 years of age and older).

Gender

Darunavir:

Population pharmacokinetic analysis showed a slightly higher darunavir exposure (16.8%) in HIV infected females compared to males. This difference is not clinically relevant.

Cobicistat:

No clinically relevant pharmacokinetic differences due to gender have been identified for cobicistat.

Renal impairment

REZOLSTA has not been investigated in patients with renal impairment.

Darunavir:

Results from a mass balance study with 14C-darunavir with ritonavir showed that approximately 7.7% of the administered dose of darunavir is excreted in the urine unchanged.

Although darunavir has not been studied in patients with renal impairment, population pharmacokinetic analysis showed that the pharmacokinetics of darunavir were not significantly affected in HIV infected patients with moderate renal impairment (CrCl between 30-60 mL/min, n=20) (see sections 4.2 and 4.4).

Cobicistat:

A trial of the pharmacokinetics of cobicistat was performed in non-HIV-1 infected subjects with severe renal impairment (estimated creatinine clearance below 30 mL/min). No meaningful differences in cobicistat pharmacokinetics were observed between subjects with severe renal impairment and healthy subjects, consistent with low renal clearance of cobicistat.

Hepatic impairment

REZOLSTA has not been investigated in patients with hepatic impairment.

Darunavir:

Darunavir is primarily metabolised and eliminated by the liver. In a multiple dose trial with darunavir/ritonavir (600/100 mg) twice daily, it was demonstrated that the total plasma concentrations of darunavir in subjects with mild (Child-Pugh Class A, n=8) and moderate (Child-Pugh Class B, n=8) hepatic impairment were comparable with those in healthy subjects. However, unbound darunavir concentrations were approximately 55% (Child-Pugh Class A) and 100% (Child-Pugh Class B) higher, respectively. The clinical relevance of this increase is unknown, therefore, darunavir/ritonavir should be used with caution. The effect of severe hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of darunavir has not been studied (see sections 4.2, 4.3 and 4.4).

Cobicistat:

Cobicistat is primarily metabolised and eliminated by the liver. A trial of the pharmacokinetics of cobicistat was performed in non-HIV-1 infected subjects with moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh Class B). No clinically relevant differences in cobicistat pharmacokinetics were observed between subjects with moderate impairment and healthy subjects. No dosage adjustment of REZOLSTA is necessary for patients with mild to moderate hepatic impairment. The effect of severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh Class C) on the pharmacokinetics of cobicistat has not been studied.

Hepatitis B and/or hepatitis C virus co-infection

There were insufficient pharmacokinetic data in the clinical trials to determine the effect of hepatitis B and/or C virus infection on the pharmacokinetics of darunavir and cobicistat (refer to sections 4.4 and 4.8).

Pregnancy and postpartum

Treatment with REZOLSTA during pregnancy results in low darunavir exposure. In women receiving REZOLSTA during the second trimester of pregnancy, mean intra-individual values for total darunavir Cmax, AUC24h and Cmin were 49%, 56% and 92% lower, respectively, as compared with postpartum; during the third trimester of pregnancy, total darunavir Cmax, AUC24h and Cmin values were 37%, 50% and 89% lower, respectively, as compared with postpartum. The unbound fraction was also substantially reduced, including around 90% reductions of Cmin levels. The main cause of these low exposures is a marked reduction in cobicistat exposure as a consequence of pregnancy-associated enzyme induction (see below).

Pharmacokinetic results of total darunavir after administration of darunavir/cobicistat 800/150 mg once daily as part of an antiretroviral regimen, during the second trimester of pregnancy, the third trimester of pregnancy, and postpartum:

Pharmacokinetics of
total darunavir
(mean ± SD)
Second trimester
of pregnancy
N=7
Third trimester
of pregnancy
N=6
Postpartum
(6-12 weeks)
N=6
Cmax, ng/mL 4,340 ± 1,616 4,910 ± 970 7,918 ± 2,199
AUC24h, ng.h/mL 47,293 ± 19,058 47,991 ± 9,879 99,613 ± 34,862
Cmin, ng/mL 168 ± 149 184 ± 991,538 ± 1,344

The exposure to cobicistat was lower during pregnancy, potentially leading to suboptimal boosting of darunavir. During the second trimester of pregnancy, cobicistat Cmax, AUC24h, and Cmin were 50%, 63%, and 83% lower, respectively, as compared with postpartum. During the third trimester of pregnancy, cobicistat Cmax, AUC24h, and Cmin, were 27%, 49%, and 83% lower, respectively, as compared with postpartum.

5.3. Preclinical safety data

Darunavir

Animal toxicology studies have been conducted at exposures up to clinical exposure levels with darunavir alone, in mice, rats and dogs and in combination with ritonavir in rats and dogs.

In repeated-dose toxicology studies in mice, rats and dogs, there were only limited effects of treatment with darunavir. In rodents the target organs identified were the haematopoietic system, the blood coagulation system, liver and thyroid. A variable but limited decrease in red blood cell-related parameters was observed, together with increases in activated partial thromboplastin time. Changes were observed in liver (hepatocyte hypertrophy, vacuolation, increased liver enzymes) and thyroid (follicular hypertrophy). In the rat, the combination of darunavir with ritonavir lead to a small increase in effect on RBC parameters, liver and thyroid and increased incidence of islet fibrosis in the pancreas (in male rats only) compared to treatment with darunavir alone. In the dog, no major toxicity findings or target organs were identified up to exposures equivalent to clinical exposure at the recommended dose.

In a study conducted in rats, the number of corpora lutea and implantations were decreased in the presence of maternal toxicity. Otherwise, there were no effects on mating or fertility with darunavir treatment up to 1,000 mg/kg/day and exposure levels below (AUC-0.5 fold) of that in human at the clinically recommended dose. Up to same dose levels, there was no teratogenicity with darunavir in rats and rabbits when treated alone nor in mice when treated in combination with ritonavir. The exposure levels were lower than those with the recommended clinical dose in humans. In a pre- and postnatal development assessment in rats, darunavir with and without ritonavir, caused a transient reduction in body weight gain of the offspring pre-weaning and there was a slight delay in the opening of eyes and ears. Darunavir in combination with ritonavir caused a reduction in the number of pups that exhibited the startle response on day 15 of lactation and a reduced pup survival during lactation. These effects may be secondary to pup exposure to the active substance via the milk and/or maternal toxicity. No post weaning functions were affected with darunavir alone or in combination with ritonavir. In juvenile rats receiving darunavir up to days 23-26, increased mortality was observed with convulsions in some animals. Exposure in plasma, liver and brain was considerably higher than in adult rats after comparable doses in mg/kg between days 5 and 11 of age. After day 23 of life, the exposure was comparable to that in adult rats. The increased exposure was likely at least partly due to immaturity of the drug-metabolising enzymes in juvenile animals. No treatment related mortalities were noted in juvenile rats dosed at 1,000 mg/kg darunavir (single dose) on day 26 of age or at 500 mg/kg (repeated dose) from day 23 to 50 of age, and the exposures and toxicity profile were comparable to those observed in adult rats.

Due to uncertainties regarding the rate of development of the human blood brain barrier and liver enzymes REZOLSTA should not be used in paediatric patients below 3 years of age.

Darunavir was evaluated for carcinogenic potential by oral gavage administration to mice and rats up to 104 weeks. Daily doses of 150, 450 and 1,000 mg/kg were administered to mice and doses of 50, 150 and 500 mg/kg were administered to rats. Dose-related increases in the incidences of hepatocellular adenomas and carcinomas were observed in males and females of both species. Thyroid follicular cell adenomas were noted in male rats. Administration of darunavir did not cause a statistically significant increase in the incidence of any other benign or malignant neoplasm in mice or rats. The observed hepatocellular and thyroid tumours in rodents are considered to be of limited relevance to humans. Repeated administration of darunavir to rats caused hepatic microsomal enzyme induction and increased thyroid hormone elimination, which predispose rats, but not humans, to thyroid neoplasms. At the highest tested doses, the systemic exposures (based on AUC) to darunavir when co-administered with ritonavir were between 0.4- and 0.7-fold (mice) and 0.7- and 1-fold (rats), relative to those observed in humans at the recommended therapeutic doses.

After 2 years administration of darunavir at exposures at or below the human exposure, kidney changes were observed in mice (nephrosis) and rats (chronic progressive nephropathy).

Darunavir was not mutagenic or genotoxic in a battery of in vitro and in vivo assays including bacterial reverse mutation (Ames), chromosomal aberration in human lymphocytes and in vivo micronucleus test in mice.

Cobicistat

Non-clinical data reveal no special hazard for humans based on conventional studies of repeated dose toxicity, genotoxicity, and toxicity to reproduction and development. No teratogenic effects were observed in rats and rabbit developmental toxicity studies. In rats, ossification changes in the spinal column and sternebrae of fetuses occurred at a dose that produced significant maternal toxicity.

Ex vivo rabbit studies and in vivo dog studies suggest that cobicistat has a low potential for QT prolongation, and may slightly prolong the PR interval and decrease left ventricular function at mean concentrations at least 10-fold higher than the human exposure at the recommended 150 mg daily dose.

A long term carcinogenicity study of cobicistat in rats revealed tumourigenic potential specific for this species, that is regarded as of no relevance for humans. A long term carcinogenicity study in mice did not show any carcinogenic potential.

© All content on this website, including data entry, data processing, decision support tools, "RxReasoner" logo and graphics, is the intellectual property of RxReasoner and is protected by copyright laws. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of any part of this content without explicit written permission from RxReasoner is strictly prohibited. Any third-party content used on this site is acknowledged and utilized under fair use principles.