Source: European Medicines Agency (EU) Revision Year: 2019 Publisher: Aerie Pharmaceuticals Ireland, Limited, Athlone Business and Technology Park, Dublin Road, Garrycastle, Athlone, Co Westmeath, N37 DW40, Ireland
Pharmacotherapeutic group: Ophthalmologicals, antiglaucoma preparations and miotics
ATC code: S01EX05
Netarsudil, a Rho kinase inhibitor, is believed to reduce IOP by increasing outflow of aqueous humor. Studies in animal and man suggest that the main mechanism of action is increased trabecular outflow. These studies also suggest that netarsudil lowers IOP by reducing episcleral venous pressure.
A randomised, double-blind, multicentre Phase 3 clinical trial compared the efficacy and safety of netarsudil once daily with that of timolol maleate 0.5% twice daily in reducing IOP in a total of 708 patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. The median age of study participants was 65.5 years (range 18 to 91 years).
The study was designed to show non-inferiority of netarsudil when dosed once daily in the evening to timolol maleate 0.5% dosed twice daily in patients with a baseline IOP of >20 mmHg and <25 mmHg. The primary efficacy outcome measure was mean IOP at each of 9 timepoints measured at 08:00, 10:00 and 16:00 on day 15, day 43 and day 90. The non-inferiority margin applied was a difference in mean IOP ≤1.5 mmHg for all time points over all visits through 3 months and ≤1.0 mmHg at a majority of these time points. The IOP reduction with netarsudil dosed once daily was non-inferior to the effect of timolol 0.5% dosed twice daily in patients with baseline IOP of <25 mmHg (Table 1). Efficacy was also investigated in patients with baseline IOP ≥25 mmHg and <30 mmHg. Netarsudil demonstrated clinically relevant reductions in IOP at all timepoints, however non-inferiority to timolol was not demonstrated in this population with baseline IOP ≥25 mmHg and <30 mmHg (Table 2).
Table 1. Mean IOP by visit: PP population with baseline IOP <25 mmHg:
Study Visit and Time Point | Netarsudil 0.02% Once daily | Timolol 0.5% twice daily | Difference (95% CI) Netarsudil - Timolol | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | IOP | N | IOP | |||
Baseline | 08:00 | 186 | 22.40 | 186 | 22.44 | |
10:00 | 186 | 21.06 | 186 | 21.27 | ||
16:00 | 186 | 20.69 | 186 | 20.69 | ||
Day 15 | 08:00 | 184 | 17.68 | 183 | 17.51 | 0.17 (-0.43, 0.77) |
10:00 | 181 | 16.55 | 183 | 16.71 | -0.16 (-0.73, 0.41) | |
16:00 | 181 | 16.32 | 183 | 16.92 | -0.60 (-1.16, -0.04) | |
Day 43 | 08:00 | 177 | 17.84 | 183 | 17.60 | 0.25 (-0.34, 0.83) |
10:00 | 177 | 16.75 | 182 | 16.98 | -0.22 (-0.82, 0.37) | |
16:00 | 176 | 16.57 | 182 | 16.67 | -0.10 (-0.66, 0.46) | |
Day 90 | 08:00 | 167 | 17.86 | 179 | 17.29 | 0.56 (-0.02, 1.15) |
10:00 | 166 | 16.90 | 179 | 16.69 | 0.21 (-0.37, 0.79) | |
16:00 | 165 | 16.73 | 179 | 16.80 | -0.07 (-0.68, 0.55) |
Table 2. Mean IOP by visit: PP population with baseline IOP ≥25 and <30 mmHg:
Study Visit and Time Point | Netarsudil 0.02% Once daily | Timolol 0.5% twice daily | Difference (95% CI) Netarsudil - Timolol | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | IOP | N | IOP | |||
Baseline | 08:00 | 120 | 26.30 | 130 | 25.96 | |
10:00 | 120 | 25.18 | 130 | 24.91 | ||
16:00 | 120 | 24.48 | 130 | 23.99 | ||
Day 15 | 08:00 | 118 | 21.57 | 129 | 20.15 | 1.42 (0.51, 2.34) |
10:00 | 116 | 20.09 | 129 | 19.34 | 0.75 (-0.15, 1.64) | |
16:00 | 116 | 20.01 | 129 | 19.17 | 0.83 (0.00, 1.67) | |
Day 43 | 08:00 | 112 | 21,99 | 127 | 19.84 | 2.14 (1.16, 3.13) |
10:00 | 109 | 20.33 | 127 | 19.19 | 1.15 (0.30, 1.99) | |
16:00 | 109 | 20.03 | 127 | 19.63 | 0.41 (-0.47, 1.29) | |
Day 90 | 08:00 | 94 | 21.71 | 121 | 19,91 | 1.79 (0.74, 2.85) |
10:00 | 93 | 20.80 | 120 | 18.95 | 1.85 (0.89, 2.81) | |
16:00 | 93 | 20.31 | 120 | 18.94 | 1.37 (0.46, 2.28) |
The safety of netarsudil has been evaluated in clinical studies, including four well-controlled Phase 3 studies.
Approximately 75% of subjects included in the netarsudil treatment groups of Phase 3 studies were Caucasian and 24% Black or African American. Over half were aged ≥65 years. With the exception of the incidence of cornea verticillata, no other difference in safety profile was observed between races or age groups (see section 4.8).
Completion rates in Phase 3 studies were lower in the netarsudil treatment group when compared with the timolol maleate group. Subjects with known contraindications or hypersensitivity to timolol were excluded from the studies. Discontinuation rates due to adverse reactions were 19.3% for the netarsudil treatment group versus 1.7% for the timolol maleate group. The majority of discontinuations in the netarsudil group were associated with ocular adverse reactions, whereas the majority of discontinuations in the timolol group were associated with non-ocular adverse reactions. The most frequently reported adverse reactions associated with discontinuation in the Rhokiinsa groups were conjunctival hyperemia (5.8%), cornea verticillata (3.7%) and vision blurred (1.4%). The incidences of hyperemia and vision blurred were sporadic in nature.
The efficacy and safety of netarsudil in subjects with compromised corneal epithelium or co-existing ocular pathologies e.g. pseudoexfoliation and dispersion pigment syndrome has not been established.
The European Medicines Agency has waived the obligation to submit the results of studies with Rhokiinsa in all subsets of the paediatric population for the reduction of elevated intraocular pressure in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. (see section 4.2 for information on paediatric use).
The systemic exposures of netarsudil and its active metabolite, AR-13503, were evaluated in 18 healthy subjects after topical ocular administration of netarsudil once daily (one drop bilaterally in the morning) for 8 days. There were no quantifiable plasma concentrations of netarsudil (lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) 0.100 ng/ml) post dose on day 1 and day 8. Only one plasma concentration at 0.11 ng/ml for the active metabolite was observed for one subject on day 8 at 8 hours post-dose.
After topical ocular dosing, netarsudil is metabolised by esterases in the eye to an active metabolite, AR-13503.
Non-clinical data reveal no special hazard for humans based on conventional studies of safety pharmacology, repeated dose toxicity, genotoxicity and toxicity to development. Effects in non-clinical studies were observed only at exposures considered sufficiently in excess of the maximum human exposure indicating little relevance to clinical use.
Intravenous administration of netarsudil mesylate to pregnant rats and rabbits during organogenesis did not produce adverse embryofetal effects at clinically relevant systemic exposures. In pregnant rats, 0.3 mg/kg/day (1000 times the recommended ophthalmic dose) and higher showed increased postimplantation loss and reduced foetal viability. In pregnant rabbits, 3 mg/kg/day (10000 times the recommended ophthalmic dose) and higher showed an increase in post-implantation loss and a decrease in foetal weight.
Long-term studies in animals have not been performed to evaluate the carcinogenic potential of netarsudil.
Netarsudil was not mutagenic in a bacterial mutation assay, in a mouse lymphoma assay, or in a rat micronucleus test.
Netarsudil and its active metabolite AR-13503 was found to have a possible phototoxic potential in a modified 3T3 NRU-PT in vitro assay, where the wavelength was extended to include UVB light.
© All content on this website, including data entry, data processing, decision support tools, "RxReasoner" logo and graphics, is the intellectual property of RxReasoner and is protected by copyright laws. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of any part of this content without explicit written permission from RxReasoner is strictly prohibited. Any third-party content used on this site is acknowledged and utilized under fair use principles.