Source: European Medicines Agency (EU) Revision Year: 2022 Publisher: Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Binger Str. 173, 55216 Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany
Pharmacotherapeutic group: Drugs used in diabetes, combinations of oral blood glucose lowering drugs
ATC code: A10BD19
Glyxambi combines two antihyperglycaemic medicinal products with complementary mechanisms of action to improve glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: empagliflozin, a sodium-glucose co-transporter (SGLT2) inhibitor, and linagliptin, DPP-4 inhibitor.
Empagliflozin is a reversible, highly potent (IC50 of 1.3 nmol) and selective competitive inhibitor of SGLT2. Empagliflozin does not inhibit other glucose transporters important for glucose transport into peripheral tissues and is 5 000 times more selective for SGLT2 versus SGLT1, the major transporter responsible for glucose absorption in the gut.
SGLT2 is highly expressed in the kidney, whereas expression in other tissues is absent or very low. It is responsible, as the predominant transporter, for the reabsorption of glucose from the glomerular filtrate back into the circulation. In patients with type 2 diabetes and hyperglycaemia a higher amount of glucose is filtered and reabsorbed.
Empagliflozin improves glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus by reducing renal glucose re-absorption. The amount of glucose removed by the kidney through this glucuretic mechanism is dependent upon the blood glucose concentration and GFR. Inhibition of SGLT2 in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hyperglycaemia leads to excess glucose excretion in the urine. In addition, initiation of empagliflozin increases excretion of sodium resulting in osmotic diuresis and reduced intravascular volume.
In patients with type 2 diabetes, urinary glucose excretion increased immediately following the first dose of empagliflozin and was continuous over the 24-hour dosing interval. Increased urinary glucose excretion was maintained at the end of the 4-week treatment period, averaging approximately 78 g/day. Increased urinary glucose excretion resulted in an immediate reduction in plasma glucose levels in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Empagliflozin improves both fasting and post prandial plasma glucose levels. The mechanism of action of empagliflozin is independent of beta cell function and insulin pathway and this contributes to a low risk of hypoglycaemia. Improvement of surrogate markers of beta cell function including Homeostasis Model Assessment β (HOMA β) was noted. In addition, urinary glucose excretion triggers calorie loss, associated with body fat loss and body weight reduction. The glucosuria observed with empagliflozin is accompanied by diuresis which may contribute to sustained and moderate reduction of blood pressure. The glucosuria, natriuresis and osmotic diuresis observed with empagliflozin may contribute to the improvement in cardiovascular outcomes.
Linagliptin is an inhibitor of DPP-4 an enzyme which is involved in the inactivation of the incretin hormones GLP-1 and GIP (glucagon-like peptide-1, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide). These hormones are rapidly degraded by the enzyme DPP-4. Both incretin hormones are involved in the physiological regulation of glucose homeostasis. Incretins are secreted at a low basal level throughout the day and levels rise immediately after meal intake. GLP-1 and GIP increase insulin biosynthesis and secretion from pancreatic beta cells in the presence of normal and elevated blood glucose levels. Furthermore GLP-1 also reduces glucagon secretion from pancreatic alpha cells, resulting in a reduction in hepatic glucose output. Linagliptin binds very effectively to DPP-4 in a reversible manner and thus leads to a sustained increase and a prolongation of active incretin levels. Linagliptin glucose-dependently increases insulin secretion and lowers glucagon secretion thus resulting in an overall improvement in the glucose homeostasis. Linagliptin binds selectively to DPP-4 and exhibits a >10,000-fold selectivity versus DPP-8 or DPP-9 activity in vitro.
A total of 2 173 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and inadequate glycaemic control were treated in clinical trials to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Glyxambi; 1 005 patients were treated with Glyxambi 10 mg empagliflozin/5 mg linagliptin or 25 mg empagliflozin/5 mg linagliptin. In clinical trials, patients were treated for up to 24 or 52 weeks.
In a factorial design trial patients inadequately controlled on metformin were treated for 24-weeks with Glyxambi 10 mg/5 mg, Glyxambi 25 mg/5 mg, empagliflozin 10 mg, empagliflozin 25 mg or linagliptin 5 mg. The treatment with Glyxambi resulted in statistically significant improvements in HbA1c (see Table 3) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) compared to linagliptin 5 mg and also compared to empagliflozin 10 mg or 25 mg. Glyxambi also provided statistically significant improvements in body weight compared to linagliptin 5 mg.
Table 3. Efficacy parameters in clinical trial comparing Glyxambi to individual active substances as add-on therapy in patients inadequately controlled on metformin:
| Glyxambi 25 mg/5 mg | Glyxambi 10 mg/5 mg | Empagliflozin 25 mg | Empagliflozin 10 mg | Linagliptin 5 mg | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary endpoint: HbA1c (%) - 24 weeks | |||||
| Number of patients analysed | 134 | 135 | 140 | 137 | 128 |
| Baseline mean (SE) | 7.90 (0.07) | 7.95 (0.07) | 8.02 (0.07) | 8.00 (0.08) | 8.02 (0.08) |
| Change from baseline at week 241: -adjusted mean2 (SE) | -1.19 (0.06) | -1.08 (0.06) | -0.62 (0.06) | -0.66 (0.06) | -0.70 (0.06) |
| Comparison vs. empagliflozin1: -adjusted mean2 (SE) -95.0 % CI -p-value | vs. 25 mg -0.58 (0.09) -0.75, -0.41 <0.0001 | vs. 10 mg -0.42 (0.09) -0.59, -0.25 <0.0001 | -- | -- | -- |
| Comparison vs. linagliptin 5 mg1: -adjusted mean2 (SE) -95.0 % CI -p-value | -0.50 (0.09) -0.67, -0.32 <0.0001 | -0.39 (0.09) -0.56, -0.21 <0.0001 | -- | -- | -- |
1 Last observation (prior to glycaemic rescue ) carried forward (LOCF)
2 Mean adjusted for baseline value and stratification
In a pre-specified subgroup of patients with baseline HbA1c greater or equal than 8.5%, the reduction from baseline in HbA1c at 24 weeks with Glyxambi 25 mg/5 mg was -1.8% (p <0.0001 versus linagliptin 5 mg, p<0.001 versus empagliflozin 25 mg) and with Glyxambi 10 mg/5 mg -1.6% (p <0.01 versus linagliptin 5 mg, n.s. versus empagliflozin 10 mg).
Overall, the effects on HbA1c reduction observed at 24 weeks were sustained at week 52.
In patients inadequately controlled on maximally tolerated doses of metformin, open label linagliptin 5 mg was added for 16 weeks. In patients inadequately controlled after this 16 week period, patients received double-blind treatment with either empagliglozin 10 mg, empagliflozin 25 mg or placebo for 24-weeks. After this double-blind period, treatment with both empagliflozin 10 mg and empagliflozin 25 mg provided statistically significant improvements in HbA1c, FPG and body weight compared to placebo; all patients continued treatment with metformin and linagliptin 5 mg during the trial. A statistically significant greater number of patients with a baseline HbA1c ≥7.0% treated with both doses of empagliflozin achieved a target HbA1c of <7% compared to placebo (see Table 4). After 24-weeks treatment with empagliflozin, both systolic and diastolic blood pressures were reduced, -2.6/-1.1 mmHg (n.s. versus placebo for SBP and DBP) for empagliflozin 25 mg and -1.3/-0.1 mmHg (n.s. versus placebo for SBP and DBP) for empagliflozin 10 mg.
After 24 weeks, rescue therapy was used in 4 (3.6%) patients treated with empagliflozin 25 mg and in 2 (1.8%) patients treated with empagliflozin 10 mg, compared to 13 (12.0%) patients treated with placebo (all patients on background metformin + linagliptin 5 mg).
Table 4. Efficacy parameters in the clinical trial comparing empagliflozin to placebo as add-on therapy in patients inadequately controlled on metformin and linagliptin 5 mg:
| Metformin + linagliptin 5 mg | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Empagliflozin 10 mg1 | Empagliflozin 25 mg1 | Placebo2 | |
| HbA1c (%) - 24 weeks3 | |||
| N | 109 | 110 | 106 |
| Baseline (mean) | 7.97 | 7.97 | 7.96 |
| Change from baseline (adjusted mean) | -0.65 | -0.56 | 0.14 |
| Comparison vs. placebo (adjusted mean) (95 % CI)2 | -0.79 (-1.02, -0.55) p <0.0001 | -0.70 (-0.93, -0.46) p <0.0001 | |
| Body Weight-24 weeks3 | |||
| N | 109 | 110 | 106 |
| Baseline (mean) in kg | 88.4 | 84.4 | 82.3 |
| Change from baseline (adjusted mean) | -3.1 | -2.5 | -0.3 |
| Comparison vs. placebo (adjusted mean) (95 % CI)1 | -2.8 (-3.5, -2.1) p <0.0001 | -2.2 (-2.9, -1.5) p <0.0001 | |
| Patients (%) achieving HbA1c <7 % with baseline HbA1c ≥7 % - 24 weeks4 | |||
| N | 100 | 107 | 100 |
| Patients (%) achieving A1C <7 % | 37.0 | 32.7 | 17.0 |
| Comparison vs. placebo (odds ratio) (95 % CI)5 | 4.0 (1.9, 8.7) | 2.9 (1.4, 6.1) | |
1 Patients randomised to the empagliflozin 10 mg or 25 mg groups were receiving Glyxambi 10 mg/5 mg or 25 mg/5 mg with background metformin
2 Patients randomised to the placebo group were receiving the placebo plus linagliptin 5 mg with background metformin
3 Mixed-effects models for repeated measurements (MMRM) on FAS (OC) includes baseline HbA1c, baseline eGFR (MDRD), geographical region, visit treatment,and treatment by visit interaction. For FPG, baseline FPG is also included. For weight, baseline weight is also included.
4 Not evaluated for statistical significance; not part of sequential testing procedure for the secondary endpoints
5 Logistic regression on FAS (NCF) includes baseline HbA1c, baseline eGFR (MDRD), geographical region, and treatment; based on patients with HbA1c of 7 % and above at baseline
In a pre-specified subgroup of patients with baseline HbA1c greater or equal than 8.5% the reduction from baseline in HbA1c with empagliflozin 25 mg/linagliptin 5 mg was -1.3% at 24 weeks (p<0.0001 versus placebo and linagliptin 5 mg) and with empagliflozin 10 mg/linagliptin 5 mg -1.3% at 24 weeks (p <0.0001 versus placebo and linagliptin 5 mg).
In patients inadequately controlled on maximally tolerated doses of metformin, open label empagliflozin 10 mg or empagliflozin 25 mg was added for 16 weeks. In patients inadequately controlled after this 16 week period, patients received double-blind treatment with either linagliptin 5 mg or placebo for 24-weeks. After this double-blind period, treatment in both populations (metformin + empagliflozin 10 mg and metformin + empagliflozin 25 mg) linagliptin 5 mg provided statistically significant improvements in HbA1c compared to placebo; all patients continued treatment with metformin and empagliflozin during the trial. A statistically significant greater number of patients with a baseline HbA1c ≥7.0% and treated with linagliptin achieved a target HbA1c of <7% compared to placebo (see Table 5).
Table 5. Efficacy parameters in clinical trials comparing Glyxambi 10 mg/5 mg to empagliflozin 10 mg as well as Glyxambi 25 mg/5 mg to empagliflozin 25 mg as add-on therapy in patients inadequately controlled on empagliflozin 10 mg/25 mg and metformin:
| Metformin + empagliflozin 10 mg | Metformin + empagliflozin 25 mg | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linagliptin 5 mg | Placebo | Linagliptin 5 mg | Placebo | |
| HbA1c (%) - 24 weeks1 | ||||
| N | 122 | 125 | 109 | 108\ |
| Baseline (mean) | 8.04 | 8.03 | 7.82 | 7.88 |
| Change from baseline (adjusted mean) | -0.53 | -0.21 | -0.58 | -0.10 |
| Comparison vs. placebo (adjusted mean) (95 % CI) | -0.32 (-0.52, -0.13) p=0.0013 | -0.47 (-0.66, -0.28) p <0.0001 | ||
| Patients () achieving HbA1c <7 with baseline HbA1c ≥7% - 24 weeks2 | ||||
| N | 116 | 119 | 100 | 107 |
| Patients () achieving HbA1c <7 | 25.9 | 10.9 | 36.0 | 15.0 |
| Comparison vs. placebo (odds ratio) (95 % CI)3 | 3.965 (1.771, 8.876) p=0.0008 | 4.429 (2.097, 9.353) p <0.0001 | ||
Patients randomised to the linagliptin 5 mg group were receiving either fixed dose combination tablets Glyxambi 10 mg/5 mg plus metformin or fixed dose combination tablets Glyxambi 25 mg/5 mg plus metformin; patients randomised to the placebo group were receiving placebo plus empagliflozin 10 mg plus metformin or placebo plus empagliflozin 25 mg plus metformin
1 MMRM model on FAS (OC) includes baseline HbA1c, baseline eGFR (MDRD), geographical region, visit, treatment, and treatment by visit interaction. For FPG, baseline FPG is also included.
2 Not evaluated for statistical significance; not part of sequential testing procedure for the secondary endpoints
3 Logistic regression on FAS (NCF) includes baseline HbA1c, baseline eGFR (MDRD), geographical region, and treatment; based on patients with HbA1c of 7% and above at baseline
The double-blind, placebo-controlled EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial compared pooled doses of empagliflozin 10 mg and 25 mg with placebo as adjunct to standard care therapy in patients with 19 type 2 diabetes and established cardiovascular disease. A total of 7 020 patients were treated (empagliflozin 10 mg: 2 345, empagliflozin 25 mg: 2 342, placebo: 2 333) and followed for a median of 3.1 years. The mean age was 63 years, the mean HbA1c was 8.1%, and 71.5% were male. At baseline, 74% of patients were being treated with metformin, 48% with insulin, and 43% with a sulfonylurea. About half of the patients (52.2%) had an eGFR of 60-90 ml/min/1.73 m², 17.8% of 45-60 ml/min/1.73 m² and 7.7% of 30-45 ml/min/1.73 m².
At week 12, an adjusted mean (SE) improvement in HbA1c when compared to baseline of 0.11% (0.02) in the placebo group, 0.65% (0.02) and 0.71% (0.02) in the empagliflozin 10 and 25 mg groups was observed. After the first 12 weeks glycaemic control was optimized independent of investigative treatment. Therefore the effect was attenuated at week 94, with an adjusted mean (SE) improvement in HbA1c of 0.08% (0.02) in the placebo group, 0.50% (0.02) and 0.55% (0.02) in the empagliflozin 10 and 25 mg groups.
Empagliflozin was superior in preventing the primary combined endpoint of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke, as compared with placebo. The treatment effect was driven by a significant reduction in cardiovascular death with no significant change in non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke. The reduction of cardiovascular death was comparable for empagliflozin 10 mg and 25 mg and confirmed by an improved overall survival (see Table 6). The effect of empagliflozin on the primary combined endpoint of CV death, non-fatal MI, or non-fatal stroke was largely independent of glycaemic control or renal function (eGFR) and generally consistent across eGFR categories down to an eGFR of 30 ml/min/1.73 m² in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME study.
Table 6. Treatment effect for the primary composite endpoint, its components and mortalitya:
| N | Placebo | Empagliflozinb |
|---|---|---|
| 2333 | 4687 | |
| Time to first event of CV death, non-fatal MI, or non-fatal stroke N (%) | 282 (12.1) | 490 (10.5) |
| Hazard ratio vs. placebo (95.02% CI)* | 0.86 (0.74, 0.99) | |
| p−value for superiority | 0.0382 | |
| CV Death N (%) | 137 (5.9) | 172 (3.7) |
| Hazard ratio vs. placebo (95% CI) | 0.62 (0.49, 0.77) | |
| p-value | <0.0001 | |
| Non-fatal MI N (%) | 121 (5.2) | 213 (4.5) |
| Hazard ratio vs. placebo (95% CI) | 0.87 (0.70, 1.09) | |
| p−value | 0.2189 | |
| Non-fatal stroke N (%) | 60 (2.6) | 150 (3.2) |
| Hazard ratio vs. placebo (95% CI) | 1.24 (0.92, 1.67) | |
| p−value | 0.1638 | |
| All-cause mortality N (%) | 194 (8.3) | 269 (5.7) |
| Hazard ratio vs. placebo (95% CI) | 0.68 (0.57, 0.82) | |
| p-value | <0.0001 | |
| Non-CV mortality N (%) | 57 (2.4) | 97 (2.1) |
| Hazard ratio vs. placebo (95% CI) | 0.84 (0.60, 1.16) |
CV = cardiovascular, MI = myocardial infarction
a Treated set (TS), i.e. patients who had received at least one dose of trial drug
b Pooled doses of empagliflozin 10 mg and 25 mg
* Since data from the trial were included in an interim analysis, a two-sided 95.02% confidence interval applied which corresponds to a p-value of less than 0.0498 for significance.
The efficacy for preventing cardiovascular mortality has not been conclusively established in patients using empagliflozin concomitantly with DPP-4 inhibitors or in Black patients because the representation of these groups in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial was limited.
In the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial, empagliflozin reduced the risk of heart failure requiring hospitalization compared with placebo (empagliflozin 2.7%; placebo 4.1%; HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.50, 0.85).
In the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial, for time to first nephropathy event, the HR was 0.61 (95% CI 0.53, 0.70) for empagliflozin (12.7%) vs placebo (18.8%).
In addition, empagliflozin showed a higher (HR 1.82, 95% CI 1.40, 2.37) occurrence of sustained normo- or micro-albuminuria (49.7%) in patients with baseline macro-albuminuria compared with placebo (28.8%).
Linagliptin cardiovascular and renal safety (CARMELINA) trial The double-blind, placebo-controlled CARMELINA trial evaluated the cardiovascular and renal safety of linagliptin versus placebo as adjunct to standard care therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes and with increased CV risk evidenced by a history of established macrovascular or renal disease. A total of 6 979 patients were treated (linagliptin 5 mg: 3 494, placebo: 3 485) and followed for a median of 2.2 years. The trial population included 1 211 (17.4%) patients ≥ 75 years of age, the mean HbA1c was 8.0%, 63% were male. Approximately 19% of the population had an eGFR of 45-60 mL/min/1.73 m² , 28% of 30-45 mL/min/1.73 m² and 15% of <30 mL/min/1.73 m².
Linagliptin did not increase the risk of the combined endpoint of CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction or non-fatal stroke (MACE-3) [HR=1.02; (95% CI 0.89, 1.17); p=0.0002 for noninferiority], or the risk of combined endpoint of renal death, ESRD, 40% or more sustained decrease in eGFR [HR=1.04; (95% CI 0.89, 1.22)]. In analyses for albuminuria progression (change from normoalbuminuria to micro-or macroalbuminuria, or from microalbuminuria to macroalbuminuria) the estimated hazard ratio was 0.86 (95% CI 0.78, 0.95) for linagliptin versus placebo. In addition, linagliptin did not increase the risk of hospitalization for heart failure [HR=0.90; (95% CI 0.74, 1.08)]. No increased risk of CV death or all-cause mortality was observed.
Safety data from this trial was in line with previous known safety profile of linagliptin.
The double-blind parallel group CAROLINA trial evaluated the cardiovascular safety of linagliptin versus glimepiride as adjunct to standard care therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes and with increased CV risk. A total of 6 033 patients were treated (linagliptin 5 mg: 3 023, glimepiride 1 mg to 4 mg: 3 010) and followed for a median of 6.25 years. The mean age was 64 years, the mean HbA1c was 7.15%, and 60% were male. Approximately 19% of the population had an eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m².
The trial was designed to demonstrate non-inferiority for the primary cardiovascular endpoint which was a composite of the first occurrence of cardiovascular death or a non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) or a non-fatal stroke (3P-MACE). Linagliptin did not increase the risk of the combined endpoint of CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction or non-fatal stroke (MACE-3) [Hazard Ratio (HR)=0.98; (95% CI 0.84, 1.14); p<0.0001 for non-inferiority], when added to standard of care in adult patients with type 2 diabetes with increased CV risk compared to glimepiride (see Table 7).
Table 7. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and mortality by treatment group in the CAROLINA trial:
| Linagliptin 5mg | Glimepiride (1-4mg) | Hazard ratio | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Subjects (%) | Incidence Rate per 1000 PY* | Number of Subjects (%) | Incidence Rate per 1000 PY* | (95% CI) | |
| Number of patients | 3023 | 3010 | |||
| Primary CV composite (Cardiovascular death, non-fatal MI, non-fatal stroke) | 356 (11.8) | 20.7 | 362 (12.0) | 21.2 | 0.98 (0.84, 1.14)** |
| All-cause mortality | 308 (10.2) | 16.8 | 336 (11.2) | 18.4 | 0.91 (0.78,1.06) |
| CV death | 169 (5.6) | 9.2 | 168 (5.6) | 9.2 | 1.00 (0.81, 1.24) |
| Hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) | 112 (3.7) | 6.4 | 92 (3.1) | 5.3 | 1.21 (0.92, 1.59) |
* PY=patient years
** Test on non-inferiority to demonstrate that the upper bound of the 95% CI for the hazard ratio is less than 1.3
The European Medicines Agency has waived the obligation to submit the results of trials with Glyxambi in all subsets of the paediatric population in type 2 diabetes mellitus (see section 4.2 for information on paediatric use).
The rate and extent of absorption of empagliflozin and linagliptin in Glyxambi are equivalent to the bioavailability of empagliflozin and linagliptin when administered as individual tablets.The pharmacokinetics of empagliflozin and linagliptin as single agents have been extensively characterized in healthy subjects and patients with type 2 diabetes. Pharmacokinetics were generally similar in healthy subjects and in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Glyxambi showed a similar food effect as the individual active substances. Glyxambi can therefore be taken with or without food.
After oral administration, empagliflozin was rapidly absorbed with peak plasma concentrations occurring at a median tmax of 1.5 hours post dose. Thereafter, plasma concentrations declined in a biphasic manner with a rapid distribution phase and a relatively slow terminal phase. The steady state mean plasma area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and Cmax were 1,870 nmol.h and 259 nmol/L with empagliflozin 10 mg and 4,740 nmol.h and 687 nmol/L with empagliflozin 25 mg once daily. Systemic exposure of empagliflozin increased in a dose proportional manner. The single dose and steady state pharmacokinetic parameters of empagliflozin were similar suggesting linear pharmacokinetics with respect to time. Administration of empagliflozin 25 mg after intake of a high-fat and high calorie meal resulted in slightly lower exposure; AUC decreased by approximately 16% and Cmax by approximately 37% compared to fasted condition. The observed effect of food on empagliflozin pharmacokinetics was not considered clinically relevant and empagliflozin may be administered with or without food.
The apparent steady-state volume of distribution was estimated to be 73.8 L based on the population pharmacokinetic analysis. Following administration of an oral [14C]-empagliflozin solution to healthy volunteers, the red blood cell partitioning was approximately 37% and plasma protein binding was 86%.
No major metabolites of empagliflozin were detected in human plasma and the most abundant metabolites were three glucuronide conjugates (2-, 3-, and 6-O-glucuronide). Systemic exposure of each metabolite was less than 10% of total drug-related material. In vitro studies suggest that the primary route of metabolism of empagliflozin in humans is glucuronidation by the uridine 5'- diphospho-glucuronosyltransferases UGT2B7, UGT1A3, UGT1A8 and UGT1A9.
Based on the population pharmacokinetic analysis, the apparent terminal elimination half life of empagliflozin was estimated to be 12.4 hours and apparent oral clearance was 10.6 L/hour. The inter subject and residual variabilities for empagliflozin oral clearance were 39.1% and 35.8%, respectively. With once daily dosing, steady state plasma concentrations of empagliflozin were reached by the fifth dose. Consistent with the half life, up to 22% accumulation, with respect to plasma AUC, was observed at steady state.
Following administration of an oral [14C]-empagliflozin solution to healthy volunteers, approximately 96% of the drug-related radioactivity was eliminated in faeces (41%) or urine (54%). The majority of drug-related radioactivity recovered in faeces was unchanged parent drug and approximately half of drug related radioactivity excreted in urine was unchanged parent drug.
After oral administration of a 5 mg dose to healthy volunteers or patients, linagliptin was rapidly absorbed, with peak plasma concentrations (median Tmax) occurring 1.5 hours post-dose.
After once daily dosing of 5 mg linagliptin, steady-state plasma concentrations are reached by the third dose. Plasma AUC of linagliptin increased approximately 33% following 5 mg doses at steady-state compared to the first dose. The intra-subject and inter-subject coefficients of variation for linagliptin AUC were small (12.6% and 28.5%, respectively). Due to the concentration dependent binding of linagliptin to DPP-4, the pharmacokinetics of linagliptin based on total exposure is not linear; indeed total plasma AUC of linagliptin increased in a less than dose-proportional manner while unbound AUC increases in a roughly dose-proportional manner.
The absolute bioavailability of linagliptin is approximately 30%. Co-administration of a high-fat meal with linagliptin prolonged the time to reach Cmax by 2 hours and lowered Cmax by 15% but no influence on AUC0-72h was observed. No clinically relevant effect of Cmax and Tmax changes is expected; therefore linagliptin may be administered with or without food.
The steady state plasma AUCτ,ss and Cmax,ss concentrations of linagliptin were 153 nmol*hr/L and 12.9 nmol/L for linagliptin 5 mg once daily for 7 days.
As a result of tissue binding, the mean apparent volume of distribution at steady-state following a single 5 mg intravenous dose of linagliptin to healthy subjects is approximately 1,110 litres, indicating that linagliptin extensively distributes to the tissues. Plasma protein binding of linagliptin is concentration-dependent, decreasing from about 99% at 1 nmol/L to 75-89% at ≥30 nmol/L, reflecting saturation of binding to DPP-4 with increasing concentration of linagliptin. At high concentrations, where DPP-4 is fully saturated, 70-80% of linagliptin was bound to other plasma proteins than DPP-4, hence 30-20% were unbound in plasma.
Following a [14C] linagliptin oral 10 mg dose, approximately 5% of the radioactivity was excreted in urine. Metabolism plays a subordinate role in the elimination of linagliptin. One main metabolite with a relative exposure of 13.3% of linagliptin at steady-state was detected which was found to be pharmacologically inactive and thus to not contribute to the plasma DPP-4 inhibitory activity of linagliptin.
Plasma concentrations of linagliptin decline in a triphasic manner with a long terminal half-life (terminal half-life for linagliptin more than 100 hours) that is mostly related to the saturable, tight binding of linagliptin to DPP-4 and does not contribute to the accumulation of the medicinal product. The effective half-life for accumulation of linagliptin, as determined from oral administration of multiple doses of 5 mg linagliptin, is approximately 12 hours. Following administration of an oral [14C] linagliptin dose to healthy subjects, approximately 85% of the administered radioactivity was eliminated in faeces (80%) or urine (5%) within 4 days of dosing. Renal clearance at steady-state was approximately 70 mL/min.
In patients with mild, moderate or severe renal impairment (eGFR <30 to <90 mL/min/1.73 m²) and patients with kidney failure or end stage renal disease (ESRD), AUC of empagliflozin increased by approximately 18%, 20%, 66%, and 48%, respectively compared to subjects with normal renal function. Peak plasma levels of empagliflozin were similar in subjects with moderate renal impairment and kidney failure/ESRD compared to patients with normal renal function. Peak plasma levels of empagliflozin were roughly 20% higher in subjects with mild and severe renal impairment as compared to subjects with normal renal function. The population pharmacokinetic analysis showed that the apparent oral clearance of empagliflozin decreased with a decrease in eGFR leading to an increase in drug exposure (see section 4.2).
A multiple-dose, open-label trial was conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of linagliptin (5 mg dose) in patients with varying degrees of chronic renal insufficiency compared to subjects with normal renal function. The trial included patients with renal insufficiency classified on the basis of creatinine clearance as mild (50 to <80 mL/min), moderate (30 to <50 mL/min), and severe (<30 mL/min), as well as patients with ESRD on haemodialysis. In addition patients with T2DM and severe renal impairment (<30 mL/min) were compared to T2DM patients with normal renal function. Under steady-state conditions, linagliptin exposure in patients with mild renal impairment was comparable to healthy subjects. In moderate renal impairment, a moderate increase in exposure of about 1.7-fold was observed compared with control. Exposure in T2DM patients with severe RI was increased by about 1.4-fold compared to T2DM patients with normal renal function. Steady-state predictions for AUC of linagliptin in patients with ESRD indicated comparable exposure to that of patients with moderate or severe renal impairment. In addition, linagliptin is not expected to be eliminated to a therapeutically significant degree by haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis (see section 4.2).
In patients with mild, moderate and severe hepatic insufficiency (Child-Pugh classification), mean AUC and Cmax of empagliflozin increased (AUC by 23%, 47%, 75% and Cmax by 4%, 23%,48%) compared to subjects with normal hepatic function (see section 4.2).
In non-diabetic patients with mild, moderate and severe hepatic insufficiency (according to the ChildPugh classification), mean AUC and Cmax of linagliptin were similar to healthy subjects following administration of multiple 5 mg doses of linagliptin.
No dose adjustment is necessary for Glyxambi based on body mass index. Body mass index had no clinically relevant effect on the pharmacokinetics of empagliflozin or linagliptin based on population pharmacokinetic analysis.
Gender had no clinically relevant effect on the pharmacokinetics of empagliflozin or linagliptin based on population pharmacokinetic analysis.
No clinically relevant difference in pharmacokinetics of empagliflozin and linagliptin were seen in population pharmacokinetic analysis and dedicated phase I trials.
Age did not have a clinically meaningful impact on the pharmacokinetics of empagliflozin or linagliptin based on population pharmacokinetic analysis. Elderly subjects (65 to 80 years) had comparable plasma concentrations of linagliptin compared to younger subjects.
A paediatric Phase 1 trial examined the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of empagliflozin (5 mg, 10 mg and 25 mg) in children and adolescents ≥10 to <18 years of age with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The observed pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic responses were consistent with those found in adult subjects.
A paediatric Phase 2 trial examined the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of 1 mg and 5 mg linagliptin in children and adolescents ≥10 to <18 years of age with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The observed pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic responses were consistent with those found in adult subjects. Linagliptin 5 mg showed superiority over 1 mg with regard to trough DPP-4 inhibition (72% vs 32%, p=0.0050) and a numerically larger reduction with regard to adjusted mean change from baseline in HbA1c (-0.63% vs -0.48%, n.s.). Due to the limited nature of the data set the results should be interpreted cautiously.
No drug interaction trials have been performed with Glyxambi and other medicinal products; however, such trials have been conducted with the individual active substances.
Based on in vitro studies, empagliflozin does not inhibit, inactivate, or induce CYP450 isoforms.
Empagliflozin does not inhibit UGT1A1, UGT1A3, UGT1A8, UGT1A9, or UGT2B7. Drug-drug interactions involving the major CYP450 and UGT isoforms with empagliflozin and concomitantly administered substrates of these enzymes are therefore considered unlikely.
In vitro data suggest that the primary route of metabolism of empagliflozin in humans is glucuronidation by uridine 5'-diphosphoglucuronosyltransferases UGT1A3, UGT1A8, UGT1A9, and UGT2B7.
Empagliflozin is a substrate of the human uptake transporters OAT3, OATP1B1, and OATP1B3, but not Organic Anion Transporter 1 (OAT1) and Organic Cation Transporter 2 (OCT2). Empagliflozin is a substrate of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP).
Empagliflozin does not inhibit P-gp at therapeutic doses. Based on in vitro studies, empagliflozin is considered unlikely to cause interactions with medicinal products that are P-gp substrates. Coadministration of digoxin, a P-gp substrate, with empagliflozin resulted in a 6% increase in AUC and 14% increase in Cmax of digoxin. These changes were not considered to be clinically meaningful.
Empagliflozin does not inhibit human uptake transporters such as OAT3, OATP1B1, and OATP1B3 in vitro at clinically relevant plasma concentrations and, as such, drug-drug interactions with substrates of these uptake transporters are considered unlikely.
Linagliptin was a substrate for OATP8-, OCT2-, OAT4-, OCTN1- and OCTN2, suggesting a possible OATP8-mediated hepatic uptake, OCT2-mediated renal uptake and OAT4-, OCTN1- and OCTN2- mediated renal secretion and reabsorption of linagliptin in vivo. OATP2, OATP8, OCTN1, OCT1 and OATP2 activities were slightly to weakly inhibited by linagliptin.
General toxicity studies in rats up to 13 weeks were performed with the combination of empagliflozin and linagliptin.
Focal areas of hepatocellular necrosis were found in the combination groups at ≥15: 30 mg/kg linagliptin: empagliflozin (3.8 times the clinical exposure for linagliptin and 7.8 times the clinical exposure for empagliflozin) as well as in the group treated with empagliflozin alone but not in the control group. The clinical relevance of this finding remains uncertain.
At exposures sufficiently in excess of exposure in humans after therapeutic doses, the combination of empagliflozin and linagliptin was not teratogenic and did not show maternal toxicity. Adverse effects on renal development were not observed after administration of empagliflozin alone, linagliptin alone or after administration of the combined products.
Non clinical data reveal no special hazard for humans based on conventional studies of safety pharmacology, genotoxicity, fertility and early embryonic development.
In long-term toxicity studies in rodents and dogs, signs of toxicity were observed at exposures greater than or equal to 10-times the clinical dose of empagliflozin. Most toxicity was consistent with secondary pharmacology related to urinary glucose loss and electrolyte imbalances including decreased body weight and body fat, increased food consumption, diarrhoea, dehydration, decreased serum glucose and increases in other serum parameters reflective of increased protein metabolism and gluconeogenesis, urinary changes such as polyuria and glucosuria, and microscopic changes including mineralisation in kidney and some soft and vascular tissues. Microscopic evidence of the effects of exaggerated pharmacology on the kidney observed in some species included tubular dilatation, and tubular and pelvic mineralisation at approximately 4-times the clinical AUC exposure of empagliflozin associated with the 25 mg dose.
In a 2 year carcinogenicity study, empagliflozin did not increase the incidence of tumours in female rats up to the highest dose of 700 mg/kg/day, which corresponds to approximately 72 times the maximal clinical AUC exposure to empagliflozin. In male rats, treatment related benign vascular proliferative lesions (haemangiomas) of the mesenteric lymph node were observed at the highest dose, but not at 300 mg/kg/day, which corresponds to approximately 26 times the maximal clinical exposure to empagliflozin. Interstitial cell tumours in the testes were observed with a higher incidence in rats at 300 mg/kg/day and above, but not at 100 mg/kg/day which corresponds to approximately 18 times the maximal clinical exposure to empagliflozin. Both tumours are common in rats and are unlikely to be relevant to humans.
Empagliflozin did not increase the incidence of tumours in female mice at doses up to 1 000 mg/kg/day, which corresponds to approximately 62-times the maximal clinical exposure to empagliflozin. Empagliflozin induced renal tumours in male mice at 1 000 mg/kg/day, but not at 300 mg/kg/day, which corresponds to approximately 11-times the maximal clinical exposure to empagliflozin. The mode of action for these tumours is dependent on the natural predisposition of the male mouse to renal pathology and a metabolic pathway not reflective of humans. The male mouse renal tumours are considered not relevant to humans.
At exposures sufficiently in excess of exposure in humans after therapeutic doses, empagliflozin had no adverse effects on fertility or early embryonic development. Empagliflozin administered during the period of organogenesis was not teratogenic. Only at maternally toxic doses, empagliflozin also caused bent limb bones in the rat and increased embryofetal loss in the rabbit.
In pre- and postnatal toxicity studies with empagliflozin in rats, reduced weight gain in offspring was observed at maternal exposures approximately 4 times the maximal clinical exposure to empagliflozin. No such effect was seen at systemic exposure equal to the maximal clinical exposure to empagliflozin. The relevance of this finding to humans is unclear.
In a juvenile toxicity study in the rat, when empagliflozin was administered from postnatal day 21 until postnatal day 90, non-adverse, minimal to mild renal tubular and pelvic dilation in juvenile rats was seen only at 100 mg/kg/day, which approximates 11-times the maximum clinical dose of 25 mg. These findings were absent after a 13 weeks drug-free recovery period.
Non clinical data reveal no special hazard for humans based on conventional studies of safety pharmacology, genotoxicity, fertility and early embryonic development.
In long-term toxicity studies in rodents and Cynomolgus monkeys, signs of toxicity were observed at exposures greater than 300-times the clinical dose of linagliptin.
Liver, kidneys and gastrointestinal tract are the principal target organs of toxicity in mice and rats. At exposures greater than 1 500-times the clinical exposure, adverse reactions on reproductive organs, thyroid and the lymphoid organs were seen in rats. Strong pseudo-allergic reactions were observed in dogs at medium doses, secondarily causing cardiovascular changes, which were considered dogspecific. Liver, kidneys, stomach, reproductive organs, thymus, spleen, and lymph nodes were target organs of toxicity in Cynomolgus monkeys at more than 450-times the clinical exposure. At more than 100-times clinical exposure, irritation of the stomach was the major finding in monkeys.
Oral 2-year carcinogenicity studies in rats and mice revealed no evidence of carcinogenicity in rats or male mice. A significantly higher incidence of malignant lymphomas only in female mice at the highest dose (>200-times human exposure) is not considered relevant for humans. Based on these studies there is no concern for carcinogenicity in humans.
Linagliptin had no adverse effects on fertility or early embryonic development at exposures greater than 900-times the clinical exposure. Linagliptin administered during the period of organogenesis was not teratogenic. Only at maternally toxic doses, linagliptin caused a slight retardation of skeletal ossification in the rat and increased embryofoetal loss in the rabbit.
In the pre- and postnatal toxicity study with linagliptin in rats, reduced weight gain in offspring was observed at maternal exposures approximately 1 500-times the maximal clinical exposure to linagliptin. No such effect was seen at systemic exposure 49-times the maximal clinical exposure to linagliptin.
© All content on this website, including data entry, data processing, decision support tools, "RxReasoner" logo and graphics, is the intellectual property of RxReasoner and is protected by copyright laws. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of any part of this content without explicit written permission from RxReasoner is strictly prohibited. Any third-party content used on this site is acknowledged and utilized under fair use principles.
