Source: Medicines & Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (GB) Revision Year: 2020 Publisher: Pfizer Limited, Ramsgate Road, Sandwich, Kent, CT13 9NJ, United Kingdom
For the treatment of postmenopausal symptoms, HRT should only be initiated for symptoms that adversely affect quality of life. In all cases, a careful appraisal of the risks and benefits should be undertaken at least annually and HRT should only be continued as long as the benefit outweighs the risk.
Evidence regarding the risks associated with HRT in the treatment of premature menopause is limited. Due to the low level of absolute risk in younger women, however, the balance of benefits and risks for these women may be more favourable than in older women.
Before initiating or reinstituting HRT, a complete personal and family medical history should be taken. Physical (including pelvic and breast) examination should be guided by this and by the contraindications and warnings for use. During treatment, periodic check-ups are recommended of a frequency and nature adapted to the individual woman. Women should be advised what changes in their breasts should be reported to their doctor or nurse (see ‘Breast Cancer’ below). Investigations, including appropriate imaging tools, e.g. mammography, should be carried out in accordance with currently accepted screening practices, modified to the clinical needs of the individual.
If any of the following conditions are present, have occurred previously, and/or have been aggravated during pregnancy or previous hormone treatment, the patient should be closely supervised. It should be taken into account that these conditions may recur or be aggravated during treatment with Premique Low Dose, in particular:
Therapy should be discontinued in case a contra-indication is discovered and in the following situations:
In women with an intact uterus the risk of endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma is increased when estrogens are administered alone for prolonged periods. The reported increase in endometrial cancer risk among estrogen-only users varies from 2-to 12-fold greater compared with non-users, depending on the duration of treatment and estrogen dose (see section 4.8). After stopping treatment risk may remain elevated for at least 10 years.
The addition of a progestogen for at least 12 days per month/28 day cycle or continuous combined estrogen-progestogen therapy in non-hysterectomised women prevents the excess risk associated with estrogen-only HRT. Unless there is a previous diagnosis of endometriosis it is not recommended to add a progestogen in hysterectomised women.
The reduction in risk to the endometrium should be weighed against the increase in the risk of breast cancer of added progestogen (see ‘Breast cancer’ below and section 4.8).
Break-through bleeding and spotting may occur during the first months of treatment. If break-through bleeding or spotting appears after some time on therapy, or continues after treatment has been discontinued, the reason should be investigated, which may include endometrial biopsy to exclude endometrial malignancy.
The overall evidence shows an increased risk of breast cancer in women taking combined estrogen-progestogen or estrogen-only HRT, that is dependent on the duration of taking HRT.
The randomised placebo-controlled trial, the Women’s Health Initiative study (WHI), and a meta-analysis of prospective epidemiological studies are consistent in finding an increased risk of breast cancer in women taking estrogen-progestogen combinations for HRT that becomes apparent after about 3 (1-4) years (see section 4.8).
Results from a large meta-analysis showed that after stopping treatment, the excess risk will decrease with time and the time needed to return to baseline depends on the duration of prior HRT use. When HRT was taken for more than 5 years, the risk may persist for 10 years or more.
HRT, especially estrogen-progestogen combined treatment, increases the density of mammographic images which may adversely affect the radiological detection of breast cancer.
Ovarian cancer is much rarer than breast cancer.
Epidemiological evidence from a large meta-analysis suggests a slightly increased risk in women taking estrogen-only or combined estrogen-progestogen HRT, which becomes apparent within 5 years of use and diminishes over time after stopping.
Some other studies, including the WHI trial, suggest that the use of combined HRTs may be associated with a similar or slightly smaller risk (see section 4.8).
Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is associated with a 1.3-3 fold risk of developing venous thromboembolism (VTE) i.e. deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. The occurrence of such an event is more likely in the first year of HRT than later (see section 4.8).
Patients with a history of VTE or known thrombophilic states have an increased risk of VTE. HRT may add to this risk. HRT is therefore contraindicated in these patients (see section 4.3). Personal or strong family history of thromboembolism or recurrent spontaneous abortion should be investigated in order to exclude a thrombophilic predisposition.
Generally recognised risk factors for VTE include, use of estrogens, older age, major surgery, prolonged immobilisation, obesity (BMI >30 kg/m²), pregnancy/postpartum period, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and cancer. There is no consensus about the possible role of varicose veins in VTE.
As in all postoperative patients scrupulous attention should be given to prophylactic measures to prevent VTE following surgery. Where prolonged immobilisation is liable to follow elective surgery, particularly abdominal or orthopaedic surgery to the lower limbs, consideration should be given to temporarily stopping HRT 4-6 weeks earlier, if this is possible. Treatment should not be restarted until the woman is completely mobilised.
In women with no personal history of VTE but with a first degree relative with a history of thrombosis at young age, screening may be offered after careful counselling regarding its limitations (only a proportion of thrombophilic defects are identified by screening). If a thrombophilic defect is identified which segregates with thrombosis in family members or if the defect is ‘severe’ (e.g., antithrombin, protein S, or protein C deficiencies or a combination of defects) HRT is contraindicated.
Women already on anticoagulant treatment require careful consideration of the benefit-risk of use of HRT.
If venous thromboembolism develops after initiating therapy the drug should be discontinued. Patients should be told to contact their doctors immediately when they are aware of potential thromboembolic symptoms (e.g. painful swelling of a leg, sudden pain in the chest, dyspnoea).
There is no evidence from randomised controlled trials of protection against myocardial infarction in women with or without existing CAD who received MPA.
The relative risk of CAD during use of combined estrogen+progestogen HRT is slightly increased. As the baseline absolute risk of CAD is strongly dependent on age, the number of extra cases of CAD due to estrogen+progestogen use is very low in healthy women close to menopause, but will rise with more advanced age.
Combined estrogen-progestogen and estrogen-only therapy are associated with an up to 1.5-fold increase in risk of ischaemic stroke. The relative risk does not change with age or time since menopause. However, as the baseline risk of stroke is strongly age-dependent, the overall risk of stroke in women who use HRT will increase with age (see section 4.8).
Estrogens increase thyroid binding globulin (TBG), leading to increased circulating total thyroid hormone, as measured by protein-bound iodine (PBI), T4 levels (by column or by radio-immunoassay) or T3 levels (by radio-immunoassay). T3 resin uptake is decreased, reflecting the elevated TBG. Free T4 and free T3 concentrations are usually unaltered.
Other binding proteins may be elevated in serum, i.e. corticoid binding globulin (CBG), sex-hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) leading to increased circulating corticosteroids and sex steroids, respectively. Free or biologically active hormone concentrations are usually unchanged. Other plasma proteins may be increased (angiotensinogen/renin substrate, alpha-I-antitrypsin, ceruloplasmin).
Some patients dependent on thyroid hormone replacement therapy may require increased doses in order to maintain their free thyroid hormone levels in an acceptable range. Therefore, patients should have their thyroid function monitored more frequently when commencing concurrent treatment in order to maintain their free thyroid hormone levels in an acceptable range.
The metabolism of estrogens and progestogens may be increased by concomitant use of substances known to induce drug-metabolising enzymes, specifically cytochrome P450 enzymes, such as anticonvulsants (e.g. phenobarbital, phenytoin, carbamazepine) and anti-infectives (e.g. rifampicin, rifabutin, nevirapine, efavirenz).
Ritonavir and nelfinavir, although known as strong inhibitors, by contrast exhibit inducing properties when used concomitantly with steroid hormones.
Herbal preparations containing St John’s wort (Hypericum perforatum) may induce the metabolism of estrogens and progestogens.
Clinically, an increased metabolism of estrogens and progestogens may lead to decreased effect and changes in the uterine bleeding profile.
The response to metyrapone may be reduced.
Aminogluthimide administered concomitantly with MPA may significantly depress the bioavailability of MPA.
Premique Low Dose is not indicated during pregnancy. If pregnancy occurs during medication with Premique Low Dose treatment should be withdrawn immediately.
Clinically, data on a limited number of exposed pregnancies indicate no adverse effects of MPA on the foetus.
The results of most epidemiological studies to date relevant to inadvertent foetal exposure to combinations of estrogens and progestogens indicate no teratogenic or foetotoxic effect.
Premique Low Dose is not indicated during lactation.
Premique Low Dose should not affect the ability to drive or use machinery.
See also section 4.4.
The adverse reactions listed in the table are based on post-marketing spontaneous (reporting rate), clinical trials and class-effects. Breast pain is a very common adverse event reported in ≥10% of patients.
System Organ Class | Very Common ADRs (>1/10) | Common ADRs (>1/100, <1/10) | Uncommon ADRs (>1/1000, <1/100) | Rare ADRs (>1/10000, <1/1000) | Very Rare ADRs (<1/10000), isolated reports |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Infections and infestations | Vaginitis | Vaginal candidiasis | |||
Neoplasms benign and malignant (including cysts and polyps) | Fibrocystic breast changes, Ovarian cancer | Enlargement of hepatic hemangiomas | |||
Immune system disorders | Anaphylactic/anaphylactoid reactions, including urticaria and angioedema | ||||
Metabolism and nutrition disorders | Glucose intolerance | Exacerbation of porphyria; Hypocalcemia | |||
Psychiatric disorders | Depression | Changes in libido; Mood disturbances | Irritability | ||
Nervous system disorders | Dizziness; Headache; Migraine; Anxiety | Stroke; Exacerbation of epilepsy | Exacerbation of chorea | ||
Eye disorders | Intolerance to contact lenses | Retinal vascular thrombosis | |||
Cardiac disorders | Myocardial infarction | ||||
Vascular disorders | Pulmonary embolism | Superficial thrombophlebitis | |||
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Exacerbation of asthma | ||||
Gastrointestinal disorders | Nausea; Bloating; Abdominal pain | Vomiting; Pancreatitis | |||
Hepatobiliary disorders | Gallbladder disease | None | Cholestatic jaundice | ||
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Alopecia; Acne; Pruritus | Chloasma/melasma; Hirsutism; Pruritus; Rash | |||
Musculoskeletal, connective tissue and bone disorders | Arthralgias; Leg cramps | ||||
Reproductive system & breast disorders | Breast pain | Breakthrough bleeding/spotting, Dysmenorrhea; Breast tenderness, enlargement; Discharge | Change in menstrual flow; Change in cervical ectropion and secretion | Galactorrhoea; Increased size of uterine leiomyomata | |
General disorders and administration site conditions | Oedema | ||||
Investigations | Changes in weight (increase or decrease); Increased triglycerides | Increase in blood pressure |
Largest meta-analysis of prospective epidemiological studies– Estimated additional risk of breast cancer after 5 years' use in women with BMI 27 (kg/m²):
Age at start HRT | Incidenceper 1000 never-users of HRT over a 5 year period (50-54 years)* | Risk ratio | Additional cases per 1000 HRT users after 5 years |
---|---|---|---|
estrogen only HRT | |||
50 | 13.3 | 1.2 | 2.7 |
Combined estrogen-progestogen | |||
50 | 13.3 | 1.6 | 8.0 |
* Taken from baseline incidence rates in England in 2015 in women with BMI 27 (kg/m²)
Note: Since the background incidence of breast cancer differs by EU country, the number of additional cases of breast cancer will also change proportionately.
Estimated additional risk of breast cancer after 10 years' use in women with BMI 27 (kg/m²):
Age at start HRT (years) | Incidence per 1000 never-users of HRT over a 10 year period (50-59 years)* | Risk ratio | Additional cases per 1000 HRT users after 10 years |
---|---|---|---|
estrogen only HRT | |||
50 | 26.6 | 1.3 | 7.1 |
Combined estrogen-progestogen | |||
50 | 26.6 | 1.8 | 20.8 |
* Taken from baseline incidence rates in England in 2015 in women with BMI 27 (kg/m²)
Note: Since the background incidence of breast cancer differs by EU country, the number of additional cases of breast cancer will also change proportionately.
US WHI studies – additional risk of breast cancer after 5 years' use:
Age range (yrs) | Incidence per 1000 women in placebo arm over 5 years | Risk ratio & 95%CI | Additional cases per 1000 HRT users over 5 years (95%CI) |
---|---|---|---|
CEE estrogen-only | |||
50-79 | 21 | 0.8 (0.7 – 1.0) | -4 (-6 – 0)* |
CEE+MPA estrogen & progestogen‡ | |||
50-79 | 17 | 1.2 (1.0 – 1.5) | +4 (0 – 9) |
* WHI study in women with no uterus, which did not show an increase in risk of breast cancer.
‡ When the analysis was restricted to women who had not used HRT prior to the study there was no increased risk apparent during the first 5 years of treatment: after 5 years the risk was higher than in non-users.
The endometrial cancer risk is about 5 in every 1000 women with a uterus not using HRT.
In women with a uterus, use of estrogen-only HRT is not recommended because it increases the risk of endometrial cancer (see section 4.4).
Depending on the duration of estrogen-only use and estrogen dose, the increase in risk of endometrial cancer in epidemiology studies varied from between 5 and 55 extra cases diagnosed in every 1000 women between the ages of 50 and 65.
Adding a progestogen to estrogen-only therapy for at least 12 days per cycle can prevent this increased risk. In the Million Women Study the use of five years of combined (sequential or continuous) HRT did not increase risk of endometrial cancer (RR of 1.0 (0.8-1.2)).
Use of estrogen-only or combined estrogen-progestogen HRT has been associated with a slightly increased risk of having ovarian cancer diagnosed (see section 4.4).
A meta-analysis from 52 epidemiological studies reported an increased risk of ovarian cancer in women currently using HRT compared to women who have never used HRT (RR 1.43, 95% CI 1.31-1.56). For women aged 50 to 54 years taking 5 years of HRT, this results in about 1 extra case per 2000 users. In women aged 50 to 54 who are not taking HRT, about 2 women in 2000 will be diagnosed with ovarian cancer over a 5-year period.
HRT is associated with a 1.3-3-fold increased relative risk of developing venous thromboembolism (VTE), i.e. deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. The occurrence of such an event is more likely in the first year of using HT (see section 4.4). Results of the WHI studies are presented:
WHI Studies – Additional risk of VTE over 5 years' use:
Age range (years) | Incidence per 1000 women in placebo arm over 5 years | Risk ratio and 95%CI | Additional cases per 1000 HRT users |
---|---|---|---|
Oral estrogen-only* | |||
50-59 | 7 | 1.2 (0.6-2.4) | 1 (-3 – 10) |
Oral combined estrogen-progestogen | |||
50-59 | 4 | 2.3 (1.2 – 4.3) | 5 (1 – 13) |
* Study in women with no uterus
The risk of coronary artery disease is slightly increased in users of combined estrogen-progestogen HRT over the age of 60 (see section 4.4).
The use of estrogen-only and estrogen + progestogen therapy is associated with an up to 1.5 fold increased relative risk of ischaemic stroke. The risk of haemorrhagic stroke is not increased during use of HRT.
This relative risk is not dependent on age or on duration of use, but as the baseline risk is strongly age-dependent, the overall risk of stroke in women who use HRT will increase with age (see section 4.4).
WHI studies combined – Additional risk of ischaemic stroke* over 5 years' use:
Age range (years) | Incidence per 1000 women in placebo arm over 5 years | Risk ratio and 95%CI | Additional cases per 1000 HRT users over 5 years |
---|---|---|---|
50-59 | 8 | 1.3 (1.1 1.6) | 3 (1-5) |
* no differentiation was made between ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke.
Other adverse reactions reported in association with estrogen/progestogen treatment including Premique Low Dose:
Reporting suspected adverse reactions after authorisation of the medicinal product is important. It allows continued monitoring of the benefit/risk balance of the medicinal product. Healthcare professionals are asked to report any suspected adverse reactions via the Yellow Card Scheme at www.mhra.gov.uk/yellowcard.
Not applicable.
© All content on this website, including data entry, data processing, decision support tools, "RxReasoner" logo and graphics, is the intellectual property of RxReasoner and is protected by copyright laws. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of any part of this content without explicit written permission from RxReasoner is strictly prohibited. Any third-party content used on this site is acknowledged and utilized under fair use principles.