REZDIFFRA Tablet Ref.[108866] Active ingredients: Resmetirom

Source: FDA, National Drug Code (US)  Revision Year: 2024 

12.1. Mechanism of Action

Resmetirom is a partial agonist of the thyroid hormone receptor-beta (THR-β). Resmetirom produced 83.8% of the maximum response compared to triiodothyronine (T3), with an EC50 of 0.21 µM in an in vitro functional assay for THR-β activation. The same functional assay for thyroid hormone receptor-alpha (THR-α) agonism showed 48.6% efficacy for resmetirom relative to T3, with an EC50 of 3.74 µM. THR-β is the major form of THR in the liver, and stimulation of THR-β in the liver reduces intrahepatic triglycerides, whereas actions of thyroid hormone outside the liver, including in heart and bone, are largely mediated through THR-α.

12.2. Pharmacodynamics

Liver Fat Content

Resmetirom decreases liver fat content as measured by magnetic resonance imaging-protein density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) or FibroScan controlled attenuation parameter (CAP).

Reductions in liver fat content by MRI-PDFF were observed at 16 (the first assessment) and 52 weeks of treatment. Reductions in liver fat content by CAP were observed at 52 weeks of treatment.

Prohormone FT4

Resmetirom decreased concentrations of prohormone FT4 were observed at the first assessment at 4 weeks of treatment. Similar decreases in FT4 were observed during the treatment [see Adverse Reactions (6.1)].

Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG)

Resmetirom increased concentrations of sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) were observed at the first assessment at 4 weeks of treatment, and at longer durations of treatment. The clinical significance of this change is unknown.

Cardiac Electrophysiology

At a dose two times the maximum recommended dose, REZDIFFRA does not prolong the QT interval to any clinically relevant extent.

12.3. Pharmacokinetics

Following once daily doses, steady state is typically reached within 3 to 6 days of dosing. Resmetirom steady state exposure increases in a dose proportional manner between doses of 40 mg (0.5 times the lowest approved recommended dose) and 100 mg. Resmetirom exposure increases in a greater than dose proportional manner between doses of 100 mg and 200 mg (2 times the highest approved recommended dose) by about 5.6-fold. Resmetirom exposure increased 1.5- to 3-fold following once daily dosing; however, the MGL-3623 metabolite does not accumulate. The estimated resmetirom systemic exposure at steady state in NASH patients is summarized in Table 5. Resmetirom exposure is similar between NASH patients with F2 stage fibrosis and F3 stage fibrosis.

Table 5. Resmetirom Estimated Systemic Exposure at Steady State in Patients with NASH with Fibrosis (F2 and F3):

ParameterResmetirom 80 mg
Once Daily
Mean (CV%)
Resmetirom 100 mg
Once Daily
Mean (CV%)
Cmax,ss (ng/mL)a 778 (41.5) 971 (40.9)
AUCtau,ss (ng*h/mL)a 5850 (60.5) 7780 (65.5)

Abbreviations: AUCtau,ss = area under the concentration-versus-time curve over one dosing interval at steady state; Cmax,ss = maximum concentration at steady state; CV = arithmetic coefficient of variation

Absorption

The resmetirom median time to maximum plasma concentration (Tmax) is approximately 4 hours following multiple daily doses of resmetirom 80 mg or 100 mg.

Effect of Food

No clinically significant differences in resmetirom pharmacokinetics were observed following administration with a high-fat meal (approximately 150, 250, and 500-600 calories from protein, carbohydrate, and fat, respectively). Concomitant food administration resulted in a 33% decrease in Cmax, an 11% decrease in AUC, and a delay in median Tmax by about 2 hours compared to under fasted condition.

Distribution

Resmetirom apparent volume of distribution (Vd/F) at steady-state is 68 (227%) L. Resmetirom is greater than 99% protein-bound.

Elimination

Resmetirom median terminal plasma half-life (t½) is 4.5 hours and the steady state apparent clearance (CL/F) is 17.5 (56.3%) L/h.

Metabolism

Resmetirom is metabolized by CYP2C8 and is not metabolized by other CYP enzymes in vitro. MGL-3623 is a major metabolite with a 28-times lower potency for THR-β than resmetirom. MGL-3623 represents 33% to 51% of resmetirom AUC at steady state following administration of 100 mg once daily.

Excretion

Following oral administration of a 100 mg radio-labeled dose of resmetirom, approximately 67% of the total radioactive dose was recovered in the feces, mostly as metabolites and 24% of the total radioactive dose was recovered in the urine. Unchanged labeled resmetirom was not detected in feces and accounted for 1% of the dose recovered in urine. A metabolite MGL-3623 accounted for 3.3% and 16% of the dose recovered in feces and urine, respectively. Oxalic acid metabolite was observed in plasma but not in urine.

Specific Populations

No clinically significant differences in the pharmacokinetics of resmetirom were observed based on age (18 to 83 years), sex, race (White, Black, or Asian), or ABCG2 genotype (BCRP p.Gln141Lys, p.Val12Met).

Population PK analyses indicated no clinically significant difference in the pharmacokinetics of resmetirom by mild to moderate renal impairment (eGFR 30 to 89 mL/min/1.73 m², Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD)). The effect of severe renal impairment (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m², MDRD) on resmetirom pharmacokinetics is unknown.

Body Weight

A clinically significant difference in resmetirom exposure was not observed with the recommended weight-based dosage. However, resmetirom CL/F and Vd/F increase with increasing body weight, resulting in lower resmetirom exposure in patients with higher body weight receiving the same dosage as lower weight patients [see Dosage and Administration (2.1)].

Patients with Hepatic Impairment

Patients with Hepatic Impairment: Following repeated 80 mg once daily dosing of REZDIFFRA for 6 days, resmetirom AUC was 1.3-fold, 2.7-fold and 19-fold higher in patients with mild, moderate and severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh A, B and C), respectively compared to subjects with normal hepatic function. Resmetirom Cmax was 1.2-fold, 1.7-fold and 8.1-fold higher in patients with mild, moderate and severe hepatic impairment, respectively, compared to subjects with normal hepatic function (Table 6).

In the same study, MGL-3623 AUCtau was 1.3-fold, 2-fold and 5.8-fold higher in patients with mild, moderate and severe hepatic impairment, respectively, compared to subjects with normal hepatic function [see Use in Specific Populations (8.7)].

Table 6. Mean (CV%) Resmetirom Systemic Exposure in Subjects with Normal Hepatic Function and Non-NASH Patients with Hepatic Impairment Following REZDIFFRA 80 mg Once Daily for 6 Days and Exposure Change Relative to Normal Hepatic Function:

ParameterNormal
Hepatic
Function
(N=7)
Child-Pugh Class
A
Mild
(N=10)
B
Moderate
(N=9)
C
Severe
(N=3)
Resmetirom
Cmax,ss (ng/mL)a 1070 (51.0) 1390 (67.8) 1830 (47.5) 7730 (17.4)
AUCtau,ss (ng*h/mL)a 5100 (51.5) 5570 (66.4) 15100 (65.8)b 97600 (39.0)

a Exposure parameters presented as Mean (CV%)
b N=8
Abbreviations: AUCtau,ss = area under the concentration-versus-time curve over one dosing interval at steady state; Cmax,ss = maximum concentration at steady state; CV = arithmetic coefficient of variation

NASH Patients with Mild Hepatic Impairment (Child-Pugh A): Geometric mean AUC and Cmax in NASH cirrhosis patients with mild hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh Class A; n=20) were 6% higher and 10% lower, respectively, compared to non-cirrhotic NASH patients following repeated 100 mg once daily dosing of REZDIFFRA for 6 days. The safety and effectiveness of REZDIFFRA have not been established in patients with NASH cirrhosis.

NASH Patients with Mild Hepatic Impairment (Child-Pugh A): Geometric mean AUC and Cmax in NASH cirrhosis patients with mild hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh Class A; n=20) were 6% higher and 10% lower, respectively, compared to non-cirrhotic NASH patients following repeated 100 mg once daily dosing of REZDIFFRA for 6 days. The safety and effectiveness of REZDIFFRA have not been established in patients with NASH cirrhosis.

Drug Interaction Studies

Clinical Studies

Moderate CYP2C8 Inhibitors: Resmetirom Cmax increased 1.3-fold and AUC 1.7-fold following concomitant use of multiple doses of REZDIFFRA 100 mg/day with clopidogrel (a moderate CYP2C8 inhibitor) at steady-state in healthy subjects [see Drug Interactions (7.1)].

CYP2C8 Substrates: Pioglitazone (a CYP2C8 substrate) Cmax was unchanged and AUC increased 1.5-fold following concomitant use of a single oral dose of pioglitazone (15 mg) with resmetirom at steady state (100 mg/day) in healthy subjects [see Drug Interactions (7.1)].

Simvastatin: Simvastatin (OATP1B1 and OATP1B3 substrate) Cmax increased 1.4-fold and AUC 1.7-fold following concomitant use of a single oral dose of simvastatin (20 mg) with resmetirom at steady state (100 mg/day) in healthy subjects [see Drug Interactions (7.2)].

Rosuvastatin: Rosuvastatin (BCRP, OATP1B1, and OATP1B3 substrate) Cmax increased 2.9-fold and AUC 1.8-fold following concomitant use of a single oral dose of rosuvastatin (10 mg) with resmetirom at steady state (at two times the highest recommended dosage) in healthy subjects [see Drug Interactions (7.2)].

Pravastatin: Pravastatin (OATP1B1 and OATP1B3 substrate) Cmax increased 1.3-fold and AUC 1.4-fold following concomitant use of a single oral dose of pravastatin (40 mg) with resmetirom at steady state (100 mg/day) in healthy subjects [see Drug Interactions (7.2)].

Atorvastatin: Atorvastatin (BCRP, OATP1B1, and OATP1B3 substrate) Cmax was unchanged and AUC increased 1.4-fold following concomitant use of a single oral dose of atorvastatin (20 mg) with resmetirom at steady state (100 mg/day) in healthy subjects. Atorvastatin lactone Cmax increased 2.0-fold and AUC increased 1.8-fold [see Drug Interactions (7.2)].

Other Drugs: No clinically significant differences in the pharmacokinetics of R-warfarin or S-warfarin were observed when used concomitantly with resmetirom.

In Vitro Studies

CYP450 Enzymes: Resmetirom is an inhibitor of CYP2C8.

Glucuronidation Enzymes: Resmetirom is an inhibitor of UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs) 1A4 and 1A9. The clinical relevance of UGT1A4 and UGT1A9 inhibition is unknown.

Transporters: Resmetirom is a substrate for organic anion-transporting polypeptides (OATP) 1B1 and 1B3 and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP). Resmetirom inhibits OATP1B1, OATP1B3, BCRP, OAT3, and bile salt export pump (BSEP). The clinical significance of OAT3 and BSEP inhibition is unknown.

13.1. Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility

Carcinogenesis

In a 2-year study in CD-1 mice, resmetirom produced leiomyoma or leiomyosarcoma in the uterus at a dose of 100 mg/kg/day (51 times the maximum recommended dose based on AUC). No tumorigenic effects were observed in female mice at doses of up to 30 mg/kg/day (14 times the maximum recommended dose based on AUC) or in male mice at doses of up to 100 mg/kg/day (35 times the maximum recommended dose based on AUC).

In a 2-year study in Sprague-Dawley rats, resmetirom produced benign fibroadenoma in the mammary gland of males at a dose of 30 mg/kg/day (6.5 times the maximum recommended dose based on AUC). No tumorigenic effects were observed in male rats at doses of up to 6 mg/kg/day (3.7 times the maximum recommended dose based on AUC) or in female rats at doses of up to 30 mg/kg/day (3.4 times the maximum recommended dose based on AUC).

In a 26-week study in transgenic [CByB6F1-Tg(HRAS)2Jic] mice, the major metabolite of resmetirom, MGL-3623, was not tumorigenic at doses of up to 1500 mg/kg/day.

Mutagenesis

Resmetirom was negative in the in vitro bacterial reverse mutation (Ames) assay, the in vitro chromosomal aberration assay in human peripheral blood lymphocytes, the in vitro micronucleus assay in L5178Y tk+/- mouse lymphoma cells, and the in vivo rat micronucleus assay.

The metabolite MGL-3623 was negative in the in vitro bacterial reverse mutation (Ames) assay and the in vivo rat micronucleus assay. MGL-3623 tested positive in the presence of metabolic activation in the in vitro micronucleus assay with TK6 human lymphoblast cells, with the increase in micronuclei limited to a single concentration that produced 59% growth inhibition.

Impairment of Fertility

Resmetirom had no effects on fertility or reproductive function in male and female rats at oral doses of up to 30 mg/kg/day (6.9 times and 2.6 times the maximum recommended dose in male and female rats, respectively, based on AUC).

14. Clinical Studies

The efficacy of REZDIFFRA was evaluated based on an efficacy analysis at Month 12 in Trial 1 (NCT03900429), a 54-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Enrolled patients had metabolic risk factors and a baseline or recent liver biopsy showing NASH with fibrosis stage 2 or 3 and a NAFLD Activity Score (NAS) of at least 4. Efficacy determination was based on the effect of REZDIFFRA on resolution of steatohepatitis without worsening of fibrosis and one stage improvement in fibrosis without worsening of steatohepatitis, on post-baseline liver biopsies collected at 12 months.

The month 12 analysis included 888 F2 and F3 (at eligibility) patients randomized 1:1:1 to receive placebo (n=294), REZDIFFRA 80 mg once daily (n=298), or REZDIFFRA 100 mg once daily (n=296), in addition to lifestyle counseling on nutrition and exercise. Patients were on stable doses of medications for diabetes, dyslipidemia, and hypertension.

Demographic and baseline characteristics were balanced between treatment and placebo groups. Overall, the median (Q1 to Q3) age of patients at baseline was 58 (51 to 65) years, 56% were female, 21% were Hispanic, 89% were White, 3% were Asian, and 2% were Black or African American. Median (Q1 to Q3) body mass index (BMI) was 35 (31 to 40) kg/m² and median (Q1 to Q3) body weight was 99 (85 to 114) kg. Baseline characteristics are presented in Table 7.

Table 7. Baseline Characteristics in Adults Patients with Noncirrhotic NASH with Stage 2 to Stage 3 Fibrosis in Trial 1:

CharacteristicOverall
N=888
Fibrosis stage, n (%)
F2
F3

328 (37)
560 (63)
Type 2 Diabetes, n (%) 608 (68)
Hypertension, n (%) 700 (79)
Dyslipidemia, n (%)
Statin use, n (%)
633 (71)
434 (49)
Thyroxine use, n (%) 124 (14)
Vibration-controlled Transient Elastography (VCTE) (kPa), Median
(Q1, Q3)a,b
12 (10, 15)
Controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) (Db/M), Median (Q1, Q3)a 349 (320, 378)
Fibrosis Index Based on 4 Factors (FIB-4), Median (Q1, Q3)a 1.3 (1, 1.8)
Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF), Median (Q1, Q3)a 9.7 (9.2, 10.4)

a Less than 5% missingness in these variables is omitted.
b kPa = kilopascal; Db/M = decibels per meter

Table 8 presents the Month 12 histopathology results comparing REZDIFFRA with placebo on 1) the percentage of patients with resolution of steatohepatitis and no worsening of liver fibrosis and 2) the percentage of patients with at least one stage improvement in liver fibrosis and no worsening of steatohepatitis. Two pathologists, Pathologist A and Pathologist B, independently read the liver biopsies for each patient. Both the 80 mg once daily and the 100 mg once daily dosages of REZDIFFRA demonstrated improvement on these histopathology endpoints at Month 12 compared to placebo. In a statistical analysis incorporating both pathologists' independent readings, REZDIFFRA achieved statistical significance on both histopathology endpoints for both doses.

Examination of age, gender, diabetes status (Yes or No), and fibrosis stage (F2 or F3) subgroups did not identify differences in response to REZDIFFRA among these subgroups. The majority of patients in the trial were white (89%); there were too few patients of other races to adequately assess differences in response by race.

Table 8. Efficacy Results at Month 12 in Adult Patients with Noncirrhotic NASH with Stage 2 or Stage 3 Fibrosis in Trial 1:

 Placebo
N=294
REZDIFFRA
80 mg
Once Daily
N=298
REZDIFFRA
100 mg
Once Daily
N=296
Resolution of steatohepatitis and no worsening of liver fibrosis
Response rate, Pathologist A (%) 13 27 36
Difference in response rate vs. placebo
(95% CI)
 14 (8, 20) 23 (16, 30)
Response rate, Pathologist B (%) 9 26 24
Difference in response rate vs. placebo
(95% CI)
 17 (11, 23) 15 (9, 21)
Improvement in liver fibrosis and no worsening of steatohepatitis
Response rate, Pathologist A (%) 15 23 28
Difference in response rate vs. placebo
(95% CI)
 8 (2, 14) 13 (7, 20)
Response rate, Pathologist B (%) 13 23 24
Difference in response rate vs. placebo
(95% CI)
 11 (5, 17) 11 (5, 17)

Liver fibrosis was evaluated on the NASH Clinical Research Network (CRN) fibrosis score as 0 to 4. Resolution of steatohepatitis was defined as a score of 0–1 for inflammation, 0 for ballooning, and any value for steatosis. No worsening of steatohepatitis was defined as no increase in score for ballooning, inflammation, or steatosis. Estimated using the Mantel-Haenszel method stratified by baseline type 2 diabetes status (presence or absence) and fibrosis stage (F2 or F3).
95% stratified Newcombe confidence intervals (CIs) are provided. Patients with missing liver biopsy at Month 12 are considered a non-responder.

Starting at Month 3 and through Month 12, there was a trend of greater reductions from baseline in average ALT and AST in the REZDIFFRA groups as compared to the placebo group.

© All content on this website, including data entry, data processing, decision support tools, "RxReasoner" logo and graphics, is the intellectual property of RxReasoner and is protected by copyright laws. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of any part of this content without explicit written permission from RxReasoner is strictly prohibited. Any third-party content used on this site is acknowledged and utilized under fair use principles.